It was directed at Cactus. I think your views are mostly misguided but you aren’t whining about the debate or the criticism you have taken that I have seen.
This part is interesting because you basically just painted this forum as all “far left wackos”.
People on the right seem to think our views are the same when they are most definitely not.
It would be like if we tried to paint all Republicans as Nazis. IIRC, you don’t seem to like that very much.
All of this is factually incorrect btw.
Ah yes, once again we encounter conservatives’ favorite trope. “You just hate me because I disagree with you” without specifying whether that disagreement is over the proper level of the top marginal tax rate or over the humanity of other people. You always know they are acting in bad faith when they don’t specify what the disagreement is about, because it reveals that they know that the subject of the disagreement makes them look bad.
I disagree with Donald Trump on health care. He wanted to end Obamacare, and I didn’t. I don’t think he should be impeached for that, as it’s constitutional for him to lobby congress for it and to sign a bill that they pass repealing it. I want him impeached for abusing the power of his office to solicit a bribe from the president of Ukraine, to obstruct justice in the course of covering that up, and for inciting a violent insurrection to try and overturn the result of a free and fair election. If you think an insurrectionist and wannabe dictator is somebody you want back in office, that’s cool and all, but say so, and don’t pretend that the impeachment was over “disagreement” instead of a very particular disagreement.
To get things back on topic, I don’t disagree with Israel on the sentencing guidelines in their laws on theft (even if I could quibble). I disagree with them putting Gaza under siege and unleashing disproportionate violence.
P was closed because MM didn’t like dissent and then we left.
Yeah, this too. Anyone who thinks I’d last longer on a conservative message board posting in good faith in support of trans rights or reproductive freedom or reparations for Black people or the like than mets has lasted here is pretty lol.
Are you referring to the 2019 or 2021 impeachment?
And I’m not sure why you’re using the word trying - he was impeached both times.
Mets doesn’t even have a ban here to hang his hat on. His whole plaint rests on the mere fact that people disagreed with him, as if the expectation is that we congratulate him for bequeathing us with his difference of opinion rather than challenging his numerous ignorances, misconceptions, and abhorrent values.
You hate dissent!
Why?
Because you won’t agree with me and I hate it!
I support Trans rights and reproductive freedom to a large extent. I’m not a bot
2021
- Cool?
- That’s a helluva qualifier you put there.
- It also doesn’t falsify anything I said.
No my issue was the childish omg we let right wing 2+2ers here mets sucked there lol mets
I’m good with debate abs arguments. Master is a POS but the rest I can handle but it’s still makes me giggle
So wookie
Are dissenting views a net positive or net negative here?
Views aren’t good or bad due to being different, and neither does a lack of posters here championing a particular view mean that it is unfamiliar to most people here. Trivially, advocacy for genocide would be dissenting here, but it isn’t a net positive. There are potentially infinite number of views, and most would be worthless or harmful.
Views are good based on being thoroughly reasoned, based on good information, coming from places of shared values, etc. Novelty can increase value, but reiterating good views has plenty of value, too.
I never said that you shouldnt or shouldnt be allowed to post here. I pointed out your facsist tendencies to anyone who cares to read your or my posts.
Not surprisingly, misrepresenting what Ive actually written is par for the course for you.
Like every day just videos of Israeli police wildin’ out