As someone who lives who lives in Taiwan, I really wish the democrats would do more to pound home how ridiculous it is to be playing domestic political games with military aid with a country that faces an existential threat from a fascist regime.
His birth name was Hell but that just wasnât civilized enough
haha gym. Such a fucking clown
My mom was district council for the IRS before she retired and listening to women like this reminds me of so much of what is good in the world.
Damn, this video pop out thing is amazing.
So Trump is now saying him
Threatening the Ambassador via twitter while she testified is âfree speechâ. He does not understand how anything works.
Um, so has this story (from 2018) been debunked, or are the Dems just not bringing it up for⌠reasons?
Kiev (KEE-yev) is the Russian pronunciation. Kyiv (Ky-yiv) is the Ukrainian pronunciation. Matter of nationalism for some Ukrainians to use the latter to separate themselves from the Russians.
Slow pony, I know.
So the take away from this hearing is how to pronounce Kiev
Not great
Nah. A lot depends on the clips the media plays but overall I think that went pretty damn well for side Fuck Trump.
Honestly, Iâm just relying on you guys to do the watching. I figure itâs a clown show where the GOP looks like a joke but manages to muddy the narrative enough to push their own simpler narrative on the MSM to make this seem either too confusing, boring, or pointless to really follow.
Instead of reporting how it really is, the media tries to maintain some NPR delusion of neutrality by giving treating both sides equally, thus giving the GOP more respect than it deserves while playing down the Democrat side which is the objectively correct one. Doing this minimizes the impact of this on Trumpâs status as POTUS and weakens its potential effect, thus indirectly protecting Trump from further harm.
Nah, Speaker Boomer isnât interested unless itâs about the phone call.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195192588887822336
https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195351531387785217
https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195351783759056896
https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195351985958117376
IMO the big narrative fight will be
R: Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President, so even if we donât agree with her dismissal, the Pres gets to call the shots and it would be wrong to impeach him over a judgment call.
Vs.
D: Presidential authority should be reigned in when it is exercised for a corrupt purpose. Also, if your âdiplomacyâ and âanti-corruption effortsâ require you to sideline a career diplomat in favor of your personal lawyer and a guy whose only qualification is the ability to write a big check, youâre probably up to some shady stuff.
Other way around. Thatâs the biggest question people have. Thatâs p good iyam. They get it.
*they being everyone ITT
We arenât impeaching him over what he did with an ambassador
We are impeaching him for extortion.
Sweet of the GOP to use Stefanik now as a prop to try and paint Schiff as a meanie to women.