ITV: Impeachment Television

As someone who lives who lives in Taiwan, I really wish the democrats would do more to pound home how ridiculous it is to be playing domestic political games with military aid with a country that faces an existential threat from a fascist regime.

6 Likes

His birth name was Hell but that just wasn’t civilized enough

5 Likes

haha gym. Such a fucking clown

The GOPs only hope to stop this is to call in the big guns

7 Likes

My mom was district council for the IRS before she retired and listening to women like this reminds me of so much of what is good in the world.

1 Like

Damn, this video pop out thing is amazing.

So Trump is now saying him
Threatening the Ambassador via twitter while she testified is “free speech”. He does not understand how anything works.

Um, so has this story (from 2018) been debunked, or are the Dems just not bringing it up for… reasons?

Kiev (KEE-yev) is the Russian pronunciation. Kyiv (Ky-yiv) is the Ukrainian pronunciation. Matter of nationalism for some Ukrainians to use the latter to separate themselves from the Russians.

Slow pony, I know.

2 Likes

So the take away from this hearing is how to pronounce Kiev

Not great

4 Likes

Nah. A lot depends on the clips the media plays but overall I think that went pretty damn well for side Fuck Trump.

Honestly, I’m just relying on you guys to do the watching. I figure it’s a clown show where the GOP looks like a joke but manages to muddy the narrative enough to push their own simpler narrative on the MSM to make this seem either too confusing, boring, or pointless to really follow.

Instead of reporting how it really is, the media tries to maintain some NPR delusion of neutrality by giving treating both sides equally, thus giving the GOP more respect than it deserves while playing down the Democrat side which is the objectively correct one. Doing this minimizes the impact of this on Trump’s status as POTUS and weakens its potential effect, thus indirectly protecting Trump from further harm.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1195437146284249089?s=21

3 Likes

Nah, Speaker Boomer isn’t interested unless it’s about the phone call.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195192588887822336

https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195351531387785217

https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195351783759056896

https://mobile.twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1195351985958117376

2 Likes

IMO the big narrative fight will be

R: Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President, so even if we don’t agree with her dismissal, the Pres gets to call the shots and it would be wrong to impeach him over a judgment call.

Vs.

D: Presidential authority should be reigned in when it is exercised for a corrupt purpose. Also, if your “diplomacy” and “anti-corruption efforts” require you to sideline a career diplomat in favor of your personal lawyer and a guy whose only qualification is the ability to write a big check, you’re probably up to some shady stuff.

1 Like

Other way around. That’s the biggest question people have. That’s p good iyam. They get it.

*they being everyone ITT

We aren’t impeaching him over what he did with an ambassador

We are impeaching him for extortion.

4 Likes

Sweet of the GOP to use Stefanik now as a prop to try and paint Schiff as a meanie to women.

1 Like

https://twitter.com/PodSaveAmerica/status/1195442866228563968?s=19

3 Likes