https://mobile.twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/1220726945786277894
I would like to hear from Schiff today about the appearance of the Pedo and ask that he keep his pants on & when the gasps are over with explain that as they have acquired a Constitutional Lawyer on their team to rebuke the Pedoās takes, they will correct any liesā¦ I. E. Alan donāt get caught with your pants down.
Does Rep Demings not follow Trump on Twitter?
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1220742093250932736
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1219698190129225728
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1216399515948867588
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1212064561026797569
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1208247467818594305
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1204418062214213632
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1204065132894142469
Good point being made. The Rs could just call Joe and Hunter to testify. That have 53 votes. Itās just BS.
Every break someone should have on Lev to tie in his recollections to go with the presentation. Senate wonāt see it but voters will.
Hopefully Bloombergās people are planning to edit that Super Bowl commercial up to the last minute.
This is why I said a trade would be OKā¦
And I though this was already investigated and Joe/Obama had receipts? Is that not the case?
I thought it was already established that they did nothing wrong, allowing them to debate it again seems similar to debating if jet fuel can burn hot enough to melt steelā¦
Yeah This is what Iām getting atā¦ Canāt Joe just drop in and read all that was in the report clearing Joe. And not answer anymore alough that would still cause soundbitesā¦
Yupā¦ Yāall are correctā¦ Joe shouldnāt appear.
Iāll see myself outā¦
Not like theyāre gonna get paid for the work anyway
And have overpriced DC hotel roomsā¦
I DGAF about Biden per se, but I see two related downsides to horse-trading witnesses:
- Biden isnāt a material/relevant witness. By allowing him to testify the Democrats are implicitly conceding heās relevant.
- Allowing Biden to testify allows the GOP to make Trumpās impeachment a sideshow about Biden and avoid the central issue: Trump subverting Congressional will in the same breath he subjugates foreign policy to his personal interest.
The whole reason he did the bribery was to get Biden in a negative light in the news by having an official group (in that case Ukraine) announce they are looking into him and his family.
Iām not for calling him to this trial to help trump achieve his aim by having an official group (Senate) look into him and his family.
I donāt want Biden winning the primary, but Iām not gonna be for helping trump just to potentially slightly lower Bidenās chances.
Schiffās bit on Trump and Putin in Helsinki was very good. Would be quite damning if anyone gave a shit.
Schiff is so fucking good.
Sekulow seems upset.
I think when this is over weāll be able to give the Democrats at least a āBā on production value compared to a likely āFā for Trumpās defense team. The prosecutors are making pretty good use of stuff available off of C-Span. Have they used any clips though from a TV network? I donāt think so. So that means those clips are likely off limits. Thatās good, because if they werenāt, we would be seeing that Biden clip about firing the Ukraine official repeatedly. So I expect to hear a defense with no sound bites, except maybe a couple from Jonathan Turleyās House testimony.
I think Iāve seen them use clips from PBS, ABC and CBS
I just saw one from CBS but that was from a hearing. Iām wondering if they can use interview type stuff. I havenāt seen Giuliani with Chris Cuomo or Trump with Stephanopoulos. So Iām wondering if they are limited to sound bites from media-group settings when it comes to using clips from networks?