16 teams was the perfect balance. Plenty great teams, many solid teams, and a cinderella or 2. Now there are far too many mediocre teams and many boring matches in the group stage.
It still amazes me that tourneys mess with the 2 out of 4 advance in a group concept. It’s absolutely perfect and adds tons of tension to the group stage b/c good teams can often be stunned and knocked out, but with 3rd place teams advancing, there’s way less pressure.
As dumb as the Euro 24-team format is, the '26 World Cup is even dumber. 2 teams advancing out of a 3 team group and only 2 group stage matches is beyond awful. Knockout stage matches are fun, but there are diminishing returns and they’ve completely neutered the group stage, which used to be super fun. It seems like they want to go to March Madness or something, but are doing a half-assed attempt.
When I heard that I was like huh!!! The On the Balls guys had a good take on the teams alough I’m sure 1 of them said that & the other 2 dudes where like me, huh!!!
For the little of football that I know or see, no one from Turkey seems good enough that I could name & I see that as a good judge of recognition of a player
My young niece ripped me a new one yesterday with facts on the teams, she’s mid twenties and I’ve been ripping her for 9 years now, I guess she got her own back yesterday somewhat & gave all the stats for the EURO’S and has France as a favourite £20 bet with her boyfriend Belgium £20 and Portugal is a push.
As nearly everyone has France it’s usually a good time to bet another team like Italy, or it makes you worried if betting large.
I’d thought that change had been planned for Qatar. 2026 gives those idiots time to self-correct, or the masses can lead a revolt like with the super league
Well, that turned into a surprise butt clencher. I’m sure it was a great game for neutrals, but as a very non-neutral my lawnmower almost reached escape velocity.