A big part of being a great programmer is writing stuff that isn’t a nightmare to maintain and build on few years down the line.
Of course if your boss is a capricious nutjob, and all you care about is getting a feature into production now, you can push out a lot of slop that makes you look like a whiz.
Right, that’s kind of what I’m talking about. It’s pretty easy to write a regulation that does one very specific thing, but most of the ways you could write it may cause problems in other areas or for other regulated entities that are unintended. Drafting a regulation that accomplishes the objective while effectively integrating with the rest of the regulatory regime is really hard, and not at all obvious.
Nope. Just @KarenMAGA485728925 and the like. Some bigger accounts thrown in. Some progressives, too. No rhyme or reason. It’s not like the most popular QTs are at the top either
That was worded poorly. I meant having a willingness to attempt to analyze his work from a neutral viewpoint. Its absolutely a waste of time and a red flag in-and-of-itself etc, but one can do that and still have overwhelmingly liberal political positions in the American sense.
Harris is problematic because afaict this is a significant part of the niche he’s carved out for himself, so what he thinks the top marginal tax rate etc should be becomes irrelevant.