Oh yeah, that’s the good stuff.
9 Likes
I like how he reverted back to lower case, as if he ran out of energy.
6 Likes
Also basically…
4 Likes
I’m going to keep the “strong disclaimer clause” in my back pocket next time I commit financial fraud.
4 Likes
Apparently a year or so ago they registered some corporation(s) in Delaware as a back-up plan. Aka “Trump2”.
Let’s hope this isn’t an easy dodge for him.
But hey, will just have to go the political grift. Freeze peach and all.
27 insane things trump says he will do in a second term. Some of them I had not heard before.
1 Like
Everyone being so cavalier has forgotten one BIG thing.
It is a non reliance clause, and it could not be more clear.
1 Like
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1706789418516763118?t=qbGuRJpLQd6UBgpWB8KJMw&s=19
What’s better than fu money? Saudi money.
3 Likes
lmao False fact. Wtf is a false fact? His lack of command of the English language is impressive
I thought a big reason for his favorability among the cult was the tough alpha male personna. Do they ever get sick of all the me, me, me non stop whining?
I’ve always been on the fence with this particular case because, 1. Idgaf about big banks, 2. They are big boys who can take care of themselves, and 3. The loans were all paid back and there doesn’t appear to be any victims
However, I think number 3 might be wrong. Can anyone point out the potential victims (other than banks) that the Trump organization may have caused it these allegations are true (which they most certainly are)?
Isn’t the “no body was hurt” results based thinking?
I.e. if I borrow $500 from you to invest in a specific purpose, but I put it all on black at the casino and win, it’s still bad.
The banks provided loans on the basis of a certain amount of risk and leverage. That basis was a fraud.
I.e. the banks have lost slanksky bucks
2 Likes
You also put up collateral you said was worth X, but was in fact worth only X/3 or whatever, you sleazy bastard.
thanks, dems
2 Likes
He said “hereby,” so it’s official.
3 Likes
Again, not to sound flippant, but I really don’t care if a predatory lender gets ripped off. I kind of agree with Trump here. They should do their due diligence before lending money. Certainly, they have appraisers who are experts at spotting such gross inflation of assets. Also, he put disclaimers on the financial statements! Yeah, no. I have no sympathy for a big bank that loses money by making a bad loan. However…
You could make a case that because they loaned Trump money based on his fraudulent statements that there is now less money to lend to more deserving borrowers. That’s a start in getting me to care about this. I was just curious if I was missing anything else
3 Likes