the absolute worst part of vaccine “debate” is this idea that “you can still get/spread it if you’re vaccinated” is some sort of trump card, this dipshit governor of Mississippi is on MTP right now spewing this and of course gets zero pushback.
Like, I’ve known people who died in car wrecks even though they were wearing seatbelts, obviously seatbelts do nothing, QED.
“What’s the point of having an offensive line if the QB still gets sacked sometimes?”
Notably, some of the anti-travel restriction arguments fallacy. Border restrictions can be good if they only slow, but don’t stop, the importation of cases
I think it’s somehow tied to antipathy to cost-benefit analysis. Substituting a binary works/doesn’t work question for the more complicated “is this worth doing?”
that would actually be an improvement! the current argument from deplorables is “well you had AA and still lost, but I got NATURAL IMMUNITY when I sucked out a runner runner boat with my 27o, lol”
I think the scariest thing about it is these new things are having a demonstrably positive effect, and people are willingly ignoring the positivity that is coming from them.
I think it’s to give more people time to get boosters (eneryone’s at the travel ban, i wonder why)
Great hte UK can even tell when the infected left too - interesting we don’t say where they flew to ;) Probably waiting for that country to fess up or get their testing ‘ready’
Meanwhile, seems like USA#1 are rapidly opening up a couple of labs to actually check if they have this (yawn) 7 days, 7 days - some surveillance you got there
Travel ban won’t slow things down. The continual jingoism is laughable.
More importantly, I think I’m on full no travel ban if you’re basing the policy making on pure facts. I’m fine with it though as a matter of policy from a political point of view, because with no travel ban the eventual spread can easily be tied to your inaction.