One line has some stuff, then a blank line, then some more stuff and the word Negative floating out in space somewhere - because it’s part of some implied one row table with no table headers. Then the very next line with no space between starts of “Positive test results for SARS antigen…”
Pro tip: put a colon after. your label and don’t space things stupidly across the page. Also don’t put boilerplate explanations one line below the results, especially when those explanations start with scary text that sounds like positive test results. This is a fine design for doctors I guess but a terrible design for patients who aren’t used to reading lab results.
Any human on earth who isn’t used to reading these things would notice that next line and go oh shit. Stop constantly obtusing all over my posts.
Well I looked at it and was pretty sure what the result line was. But I probably would want some confirmation on that, even if I was 99% sure. It would be nice if they perhaps thought to prefix that line with, "Results: ". Then perhaps a return after the results line could help. But these egghead programmer types…
Fuck off. I’m seriously sick of your passive aggressive bullshit. I explained why it’s confusing. You’d ask my why is the sky blue if I posted that it is.
If I were betting on posters who would have put me on ignore, I think Suzzer would have been at the bottom of the list, considering there are very few things I can think of that we disagree on. It still seems weird. C’est la vie, I suppose.
They are not likely to get seriously ill with Covid and there have been very few deaths. But children are still the victims of the virus in many other ways.
‘Closing schools closes lives’
The closure of schools is, of course, damaging to children’s education. But schools are not just a place for learning. They are places where kids socialise, develop emotionally and, for some, a refuge from troubled family life.
Prof Russell Viner, president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, perhaps put it most clearly when he told MPs on the Education Select Committee earlier this month: “When we close schools we close their lives.”
Overall, Fauci’s gambit — which was to play a shrewd inside game to preserve an illusion, from the outside, that science and facts were safe from political contamination — had the effect of delegitimizing science and precluding the possibility of a political solution. By fudging the facts to assuage the president and moving the goalposts to manipulate the public, Fauci, however inadvertently, helped to undermine public trust in the medical response, creating openings for conspiracy and demagoguery to fill the gap. Meanwhile, by lending legitimacy to the White House’s approach, he forestalled a political showdown — one that could have seriously altered the course of the past year.