Uh, what? It most obviously is, and it was done specifically to call the poster in question a Nazi.
Lol, yes. Feel free to link to a post I made on 2+2 calling for a moderator to be de-modded because they temp-banned me. Go ahead, Iâll wait.
Wait lol what is the thing weâre talking about being done over and over? Me changing his name or you explaining what, why, and how it was a personal attack?
No, Goebbels is the Nazi. Goebs80 is the poster. The alteration Goeb***s80 (redacted to spare the mortal suffering of Goebs80) was used and deemed unconscionable. Uses of âGoebbelsâ canât add to the count.
You seemed to place some significance to my reply, otherwise you wouldnât have mentioned it. Then you straight up accused me of trolling and bad faith while refusing to back up your slander.
I think thereâs some confusion about what was being referred to with âover and overâ. Perhaps we could get some clarification.
Right, care to back up what youâre saying? No? What a shock!
The person on the receiving end did not appreciate it. Arenât we supposed to be respectful here, or are we adopting a âshe was wearing a short skirtâ attitude towards insults?
1 Like
What behavior? What are you talking about? Oh, you wonât say. Youâre a liar and a coward and youâre slandering me.
2 Likes
We arenât debating the proscription on âGoeb***s80â. Weâre trying to pin down how many times it was used and, possibly, whether or not saying eg âIt was based on an SNL skit character whose name was Diane Goebbelsâ is re-opening the vicious wound inflicted by it.
Itâs not shocking that you would make this accusation. Youâve done it constantly for years, and Iâve ignored it mostly. But itâs baseless and itâs done just because you want to dismiss me and what I say without actually engaging with it. Itâs a tactic of control and silencing opinions and people you donât like. But it is baseless and harmful and despicable. And again, not surprising that youâd do that in the least.
2 Likes
Thereâs nothing he could quote that you could not deny was trolling and claim was wholly genuine, but you still expect him to play along with this entirely pointless exercise.
1 Like
No one made him claim that Iâm at troll posting in bad faith. Yes, I expect him or anyone else to back up that accusation if they make it. If someone called you a liar and a troll and posting in bad faith would you expect them to back it up? You would!
He already has. And youâve denied it. How could anyone see this coming?
What the fuck are you talking about? He never said what I was trolling about or posted any examples of bad faith, or explained what he meant.
Fine except Iâm mad about being slandered by liars.
If thatâs the best you can come up with you probably should stop.
3 Likes
Itâs not the best I can come up with, itâs the quickest I could come up with, to put an end to this dumb argument.
OK. goof baller didnât say I did the trolling once. He said I am a troll and was posting in bad faith. Just generally. Didnât post a thing in support of it. Wonât post a thing in support of it. Repeatedly asks me âif Iâm OKâ when heâs consciously insulted and provoked me. Just, throws that out there to get a reaction and be a jerk. Mission accomplished I suppose. Having a snarky avatar doesnât make one a troll. Youâre not a troll because you have a war criminal avatar. Iâm not a troll because I have a captain avatar.
6 Likes