Community rule vote: Moderators and moderation logs

[bobman0330]

Current votes.

Possibly shady voters

Yes:

• QRomo
• Read

No:

• jmanreading220
• ArizonaRonFromTucson
• brooktrout
• GrittyNHL

[spideradmin]

If anyone believes that there are votes that should not be included in the final tally, either post here or PM me at @spidercrab. (I am only logged in to this admin account when I do the rare adminning.)

Also, it would be useful to indicate on what basis you think the vote should not be included.

Goddammit, somehow ponied on this by bobman.

[hokie]

@j8i3h289dn3x7

Ridiculous and hyperbolic criticism of a brand new mod who was clearly just trying to keep a thread on track and tone down some arguments = “just fine,” but criticizing the poster who levied that criticism against the mod = “part of the problem.”

Man, if this is honestly your takeaway from my post and this is the only thing you can say in response to it then I don’t even know why we’re bothering here.

[anon29622970]

Read and jmanreading should both be invalid. Gritty is valid IMO. No idea on the others.

[otatop]

QRomo, ArizonaRonFromTucson, and brooktrout appear to be legitimate accounts with no IP matches to others.

[hokie]

I think qromo, brooktrout, and gritty are legit, though they are extreme lurkers that don’t even read very often

Er, ponied. Not sure about ArizonaRon since they only joined 11 hours ago, but yea if IP doesn’t have a match then it should be fine

[j8i3h289dn3x7]

@microbet

Cite.

@6ix

And yet, you thought to try to condescend to and shame me

.

[6ix]

lol

[microbet]

Damn. Screenshotting the DOM. BOSS.

[6ix]

@6ix

lol

hahaha

[bobman0330]

I don’t think the IP check is determinative that it’s not a gimmick.

[microbet]

Yeah, lol. Not surprising. But, lol. Stop playing games.

[anon10396289]

I can understand how you might not know what I mean by “common law,” but it’s a pretty straightforward concept if you google around a bit.

[anon10387340]

IDK seems like we don’t need an RFC to understand that gimmicks can’t vote IF they are a duplicate vote. One vote per eligible human should be obvious. But if not, let me know so I can fire up FakeJbro.

[anon10387340]

@microbet

What happened to the other RFC anyway? Did someone shut it down somehow?

IMO it never got traction because both team captains and team boots both had people that would get banned under the proposed rules.

[NotBruceZ]

This sort of attitude is what enables people like Mitch McConnell.

[j8i3h289dn3x7]

@anon10396289

can understand how you might not know what I mean by “common law,” but it’s a pretty straightforward concept if you google around a bit.

Thanks counselor, please feel free to cite to the time this has happenned before then, to back up your claim that this has been established at common law.

[microbet]

There’s no threshold for traction though, right? It’s like discussion and straw poll, wait 7 days, official poll, wait 7 days or something like that? Unless a mod closed the thread, what’s to stop it?

[anon10396289]

I’m good. Everyone including you knows I’m correct here.