About Moderation

[WichitaDM]

I think that is a fair point of view although I have done things in recent months/years to de-escalate some of the bigger conflicts and would encourage others to do the same.

[microbet]

I mean, I’m not going to do this, but one could call every single poster who does not condemn Simplicitus complicit in the transphobia and hypocrites if they think everyone always must voice their opinions about things they ostensibly care about - especially those who have omg criticized Simp’s banning.

[otatop]

Two Hours Later

Friday came early this week.

[NotBruceZ]

When we voted on mods, where you aware that RiskyFlush would probably ban simplicitus?

• Yes, and I voted for her
• Yes, and I voted against her
• Yes, and I didn’t vote
• No, and I voted for her
• No, and I voted against her
• No, and I didn’t vote

[QuantGamble]

@microbet

@QuantGamble

Otherwise people will rightly continue to do so.

Ok, but it’s not “right”. Not in the sense of logically correct.

If they make unsupported conclusion that’s on them. And…

No, this is stupid and you know it is stupid.

@microbet

@QuantGamble

You don’t have to care.

it’s not just that. I’m not going to be forced to issue a statement because I think someone expects or demands it. Fuck that. I don’t do that in any context.

No one is forcing you to do anything. People are going to make the conclusions that are reasonably implied by your posts.

You can pretend to be autistic or whatever the fuck you are doing when you’re like “hurr there is no formal logical proof from my post to your conclusion” and people will draw the reasonable conclusion from that as well.

[alex]

It just depends on how broad you make the categories. Someone being a massive jerk could very well be worse than someone who makes a mildly racist comment. LIke I dunno, perhaps using an offensive word for a boombox stereo.

[microbet]

It’s hardly autistic. Nothing I said demonstrates supporting Simp’s ban. That’s just crystal clear. And people may reasonably suspect something that’s wrong, but that’s not the same as a reasonable conclusion. If you can’t understand that, you’re being dumb, not non-autistic.

[QuantGamble]

Motherfucker, the topic of the thread is moderation. People are going to assume your posts are on topic, so when your only contribution to a discussion about a ban of poster X is “poster X is an asshole” then that is either

(1) off topic personal attack shitposting
(2) support for the ban

People are being charitable to you when they assume (2), but it’s clear at this point what your shtick is here.

Furthermore, if someone makes the “wrong” but completely reasonable conclusion that you support that ban, you can just state that you don’t instead of doing this inane “well under formal logic my post does not imply support or lack of support for the ban” shit that you apparently think is clever or something.

[microbet]

@QuantGamble

Furthermore, if someone makes the “wrong” but completely reasonable conclusion that you support that ban, you can just state that you don’t instead of doing this inane “well under formal logic my post does not imply support or lack of support for the ban” shit that you apparently think is clever or something.

My post from 11 days ago and one of my first on the subject.

@microbet

I don’t support the ban or any bans, but I like Risky and am defending her because I like her, not that she needs it, but I still believe everything I said.

But, reading and remembering things is creepy around here so I don’t blame you for not getting that.

[QuantGamble]

Well there is also the issue that the topic of this conversation here is the ban, the only thing risky did with respect to the topic is the ban, so that statement “I don’t support the ban but I am defending risky” is equivalent to “I don’t support the ban but I am defending the ban” and if you think about it you might see how that is frustrating and confusing to engage with.

[microbet]

@QuantGamble

I don’t support the ban but I am defending the ban

No, motherfucker, it’s not.

What I was defending at that point was the idea that she could not be objective even though she is intersex and that it was awful for Simp to do things like intentionally misgender her. And, I don’t care that I said that in the “About Moderation” thread. If someone is being an asshole like that yes, to someone I like in any thread, I feel absolutely free to tell them they are being an asshole.

[QuantGamble]

Do what you like, just don’t blame others when you confuse them as to what your views are.

[microbet]

I clearly stated it early on and I don’t blame proud non-readers for not reading and being proud of it anymore than I blame the scorpion for stinging the frog.

[MaxCut]

@TW9kc2FsbG93ZG94aW5n

I am not relitigating this lmao what’s he doing is clearly doxing and I’ve never posted the stuff he’s posted here. Its been a great 25 years delete my account now. Bye.

Did I miss something? Reposting someone isn’t doxxing, right? There is a delete post option if you want to remove your own posts that you feel are identifying you.

[ggoreo]

It must be Friday already

[ggoreo]

My pony didn’t come early this week

[RiskyFlush]

@TW9kc2FsbG93ZG94aW5n

Its been a great 25 years delete my account now. Bye.

To be clear.

Are you still threatening to leave unless I do what you want?

Or have you decided to leave now regardless?

[Trolly]

I hope you’ll reconsider, grue, although I get the frustration of dealing with the endless harassment. At least keep us updated on the game over at SPE?

[jmakin]

you guys never miss a chance do you. it’s so sad.

[MimosaDef]

Wooboy people do love posting about moderation!

Maybe we should make the whole plane out of About Moderation!