Big boy @alex, protip: you gotta wait longer than that to give the ironic like.
1 Like
Iām not writing for you, but
scenario a - a group is trying to ban a few members. those members open a community with very limited participants
scenario b - a group is unsuccessful in banning all the members they want to, so they open a new community where everyone can continue their discussion without those members.
trolly - (i know heās faking it but still):
but whatever, it doesnāt actually matter. Itās gone now. GL all.
3 Likes
Is this a resignation post?
2 Likes
@alex that one is good though because it was just one sentence and a short sentence at that, even shorter than this post.
The key is to maintain some, even if itās just a shred, plausible deniability about reading the words in the wordbox. Otherwise the MJ meme hits a bit different.
No, but i am sorry for all the anger youāve been carrying for a year now. It doesnāt have to be this way though, we can talk it out. Feel free to PM me. Itās not healthy to hold that kind of grudge.
Still no evidence that CW has done anything wrong. Apologize to him now.
1 Like
I think itās wrong to open a new community while being mod here who actively bans people and have that community invite a huge % of this population.
You think so too.
You donāt have to live your life this way. Itās very republican to base your thoughts and morals simply as opposing those you dislike. You can do better. I believe you will.
3 Likes
The āaccuse CW of what people have openly be doing for two years, while already establishing their siteā and acting like itās reprehensible is amazing.
Just A+ stuff, the GOP containment thread doesnāt reach these levels.
2 Likes
Cuse no longer posts here, so should be demodded.
Simple really.
Exactly. I thought weāve seen peak GOP stuff with the voter ID demands but weāve reached new heights.
1 Like
Iām grunching but is Trolly getting so high on his own supply that heās getting confused and both saying āthey didnāt open a new siteā and āitās not wrong to open a new siteā?
LOOOOOL
You and the other 4 moderators are squatters. The fact that all 5 of you were given mod for life powers by a poll that 53 accounts voted in is an absolute farce.
Heās mostly angry at me for banning him for 24 hours after lashing at me for removing a throttle.
A throttle. Weāre talking about a 10 minute throttle. I might have removed one throttle. It could be one throttle out of all the hundreds throttles this year, but thatās enough. It aināt about that. Nah, it aināt about that at all. Itās easy to talk about, you just talk about throttle. Iām suppose to be a mod, and weāre talking about throttle. Not a ban, not a ban. Weāre talking about throttle. Not the ban that we go out there and die for. We talking about a throttle man. We aināt talking about a ban when it matters. Itās funny for me too.
7 Likes
Do you really not see the difference?
(bear in mind I donāt think itās reprehensible)
I agree. Itās too bad you werenāt more vocal against the people who pushed that. Most of them donāt work here no more. They opened a new shop.
The people you hate were the ones who pushed the 6 month term. This is why we should talk. You seem to be very misinformed on the actual situation. Hate is bad.
3 Likes
Whoās going to make the third site for the people that are pre-banned from both of the other new sites?
I donāt think thatās precisely it. I think everybody feels pressured to update their software after the OpenAI ChatGPT thing was released, but not everybody is working with those capabilities. So weāre left with the Trolly level model.