About Moderation

ctsh-removebg-preview (7)

3 Likes

Libertarian was one of two things.

Either

a) jmakin

or

b) someone observant enough to notice jmakin’s repeated use of “amuck” in place of “amok”, who also wanted to pretend to be jmakin

a) is much more likely than b) because his occasional use of “amuck” isn’t high on the list of things people remember about jmakin’s time on this site.

1 Like

I remember him trying to run amuck with little bro’s big sis, to no avail.

1 Like

Making your case hinge on the claim that jmakin is the only one to use a particular malapropism is full-proof.

2 Likes

I’m confused. is jalfrezi so stupid to think I wouldn’t just post on this account or is he such a sad pathetic sack of shit he’s so desperate for my attention? sad, weird, strange.

cya, got better things to do than this.

uh huh:

I haven’t read 2+2 for a while, but toothy repeatedly pushed a thesis that Europe was fucked this winter because they remained shut down over the summer, but USA was going to sail right through no problem because we smartly let the virus run amuck

Wonder who that anon account is… fuck off with this bullshit. You’re clearly in on it. No one is buying it.

Buy me a house?

You’re not impressing anyone.

“Amuck” was used 11 times. 3 by jmakin, 3 by libertarian and once in reference to this. And one of the others was an anon.

Wait who is it?

OK, I yield, Sherlock. It was definitely jmakin. You solved it.

1 Like

my man was absent the day they taught science at science school

1 Like

i was about to make a joke like ‘this is what happens when you only study plants for decades’ but then i realized i was confusing ‘botany’ and ‘biology’ (even though there’s probably some overlap) so just assume i did make the joke and embarrassed myself lol

You actually convinced me it was Jmakin with that search so maybe try this post again with a little sincerity?

“check it out Jmakin said that shit half the times it was ever said on the forum and the only one to repeatedly say it” and then just dropped the hell out of that mic lol

1 Like

Ask for this gift and it shall be given you. Seek, and you shall find the about moderation thread!

4 Likes

Also wait lol, why are you describing it like it’s some nefarious plot? Nobody is accusing him of doing anything wrong. So he made a gimmick for the (attempted) lulz, good effort, better luck next time.

Remember, you all are the joyless fucks averse to a little bit of fun.

2 Likes

Full disclosure, I made the Santa gimmick:

I was curious just how neurotic mfs would get about not allowing some utterly harmless gimmicks.

So the line is somewhere between the upper bound of Santa and the lower bound of Hingle McCringleberry (pour one out for a real one) but it feels like that’s a huge gulf.

1 Like

If it helps clarify things, if Santa had then started posting calling out others’ “cringe” or calling posters NPCs, he would also have been nuked.

I can’t take credit for deleting DrCeeRhenge (Head Cringologist) before anyone goes making assumptions.

1 Like

lol

2 Likes

I was also looking forward to the discussion about evading bans, considering I made those gimmicks whilst I was banned.

Considering another endemic neuroses around here is pretending like we all don’t exist outside of this forum (despite how much people openly share, you must never mention nor reference it) which, fine, let’s run with it, it raises some heady questions about online identity. If we’re all meant to remain largely ‘undoxxed’, do we just exist as a series of posts? Is 6ix just an unamused cat avatar and a string of words broken up into rectangle chunks? If those words go unread do “I” cease to exist as an online entity?

And as it pertains to the gimmicks, if 6ix is the entity that posts a specific set of words and Santa Clause is the entity that posts once a year to wish people a merry christmas, with no overlap (6ix is a godless heathen who doesn’t celebrate the christian nor the commercial christmas), are they for all practical purposes two separate entities?

It’s hi-octane tree-fall-in-the-forest stuff. And it mirrors In Real Life in some startling ways: the real reason people are told it’s healthy to have friends and family and what not isn’t because people are awesome specifically and generally (not to say they’re not, they can be pretty rad), it’s because without them you start to cease to exist as an entity, you lose definition when how people know and remember you no longer defines you. You become the tree falling in the forest with nobody to hear you crash to the ground.

But then I remembered where I was at lol vigorous debate haha I trolled myself.

3 Likes