2022 LC Thread—New Year, New Thread

From the comments. I feel seen.

image

10 Likes

8 Likes

there’s some truly unbelievable karen roleplay groups on The Site That Shall Not Be Named.

for whatever reason these get a belly laugh out of me every time

There’s a whole thread about it, “Things that shouldn’t piss you off, but do.”

1 Like

i meant facebook but yea that thread’s good

1 Like

https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1535395303955865601

https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1535398508827754497

https://twitter.com/notweetact/status/1535627619345256449

https://twitter.com/Infrogmation/status/1535407601625841667

Feels more and more like the ultimate up-from-the-roots answer to the American political landscape is making education more accessible. The more educated people get - and more importantly, the more they learn how to think critically - the less likely it is that they’ll be susceptible to nonsense when they have their political awakening.

2 Likes

Who’s interest is this in? Is there anyone within 100 miles of the levers of power who would benefit from this?

The idea of DMing a group of PCs acting like Karens sounds absolutely hilarious.

I just imagine a human fighter complaining to the proprietor about how well-kept and the clean the dwarven wenches are at a local tavern and demanding his money back. Just hours and hours of dice rolls, persuasion and barter checks in order to get a few silver pieces back.

2 Likes

You certainly get credit for self awareness.

1 Like

The embedded pdf has the meat of the conversation…and there are definitely some things in there that made me stop and think. Skynet is closer than we thought…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/11/google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine/

2 Likes

IANAL but I think businesses are required to give tips to employees in most jurisdictions.

My sister gets 6 weeks of maternity leave and that’s considered good by American standards.

Gonna be so fucked up while she’s conducting a therapy session and her water breaking triggers a PTSD episode in their client or some shit like that.

I can’t see the embedded pdf because of the way I defeated the paywall, but I think this article is an example of view-from-nowhere “objective” journalism that does a disservice to its readers. The story here is that Lemoine is a lunatic and LaMDA is a million miles away from sentient AI, but the piece does a bad job at making this clear. A better piece would have explored this in more detail:

But when Mitchell read an abbreviated version of Lemoine’s document, she saw a computer program, not a person. Lemoine’s belief in LaMDA was the sort of thing she and her co-lead, Timnit Gebru, had warned about in a paper about the harms of large language models that got them pushed out of Google.

“Our minds are very, very good at constructing realities that are not necessarily true to a larger set of facts that are being presented to us,” Mitchell said. “I’m really concerned about what it means for people to increasingly be affected by the illusion,” especially now that the illusion has gotten so good.

2 Likes

Gary Marcus says it’s not. This is him on Sean Carroll’s podcast:

And then there’s natural language understanding and reasoning, and I would say we have not really made progress at all. GPT-3, which we may wanna talk about, gives the illusion of having natural language of understanding, but I don’t really think that it does. And we are nowhere near, for example, an all-purpose general assistant. We’re nowhere near to having the kind of language you would want if you had a domestic robot.

0:09:58.9 GM: I have a cartoon in my book where somebody says, “Put everything in the living room away,” and the robot ends up cutting up with a saw the couch, because it doesn’t understand what it is that we would mean by put everything in the living room. We have no candidate solution for that problem. It’s not just that we made no progress. We don’t even know how to make progress on that.

2 Likes

Absolutely mind-boggling collapse by USA cricket today to draw against Nepal.

can someone who defines themself as “super far left” please explain to my why people at your far left end of the political spectrum are looping right back around into pure NIMBYism when it comes to housing and the homeless?

When did YIMBYs become “shitlibs” in your eyes? I just don’t get it.

It’s not complicated, YIMBYs believe in capitalism.

This is something of a left-NIMBY manifesto, I guess:

I don’t really know enough about the issue to have an opinion. This contrived example of his about what happens if a new tower is built seems like bullshit, but it might be true that allowing free-market development ends up with undesirable results.

I don’t think I’m going to go so far as cosigning a Nathan J. Robinson article, but I remain extremely unconvinced that allowing property developers to do whatever they want is the solution to anything.

1 Like