The Supreme Court: RIP Literally Everything

How about donking around a bit at 2/2 PLO on weekends? Definitely more fun than NL and not really a time suck, run it up a bit or go home! And it should be very beatable too.

I like tourneys. Cash is boring. I get antsy and do dumb shit. I need a goal, and an end.

3 Likes

Ok fair enough! Have fun folding to 2.2 bb raises :stuck_out_tongue:

Come at me with that weak shit and Iā€™m playing back.

Iā€™m not a naturally gifted poker player. But I am pretty good at owning the bubble and final table if I have a stack - like better than a lot of players who are better than me at most parts of the game.

I like it when the psychology part kicks in of whoā€™s scared to bubble or trying to climb the pay ladder. Especially at $150 live tournaments. You can just own peopleā€™s souls.

2 Likes

Sheā€™s a poker player now. She is trying to get her opponents to underestimate her by intentionally using poor grammar.

1 Like

Thereā€™s a psychology part to it? At that stage, I look at it as nearly entirely a math problem.

Psychology tells you what ranges people are going to play, if you want to use an exploitative rather than GTO strategy.

If youā€™re using a GTO strategy vs. the typical $150 live tourney player youā€™re doing it very very wrong.

For a little while I had myself convinced that 300% ROI was achievable. I had a $2k score almost every week for a couple months, and then a $7500 score.

Then I went like 35 tournaments with one min-cash and remembered why I hate poker.

2 Likes

There absolutely is psychology when people donā€™t want to bubble. More so when they are looking to ladder up to 2nd or 3rd. For the typical $150 tourney player, this stuff is a big deal. They play way too weak around the money and final table, even when they have a dominating stack.

I wasnā€™t exactly counting that under the definition of ā€˜psychologyā€™, but I suppose that is a reasonable way to look at it.

Most people play way too loose early, and then tighten up exactly when they should be widening their range.

I wouldnā€™t say you should play GTO at that stakes, but thereā€™s an argument for not being careful about how exploitative you play if your goal is to play at higher stakes against tougher opponents because you can pick up bad habits. I try not to lose preflop discipline at lower stakes, which may cost me some money.

Counterpoint: lol donkaments

1 Like

Iā€™ve never even tried to learn GTO and have no intention of doing so. My only poker goals are to play for fun or a little bit of money vs. donks.

For SNGs I used to have ICM push/fold pretty locked in. So I could refresh on that if I need to. But I have no desire to grind 100s of hours learning GTO.

wtf is going on in this thread

9 Likes

I donā€™t enjoy push-fold poker, which is why I like limit tournaments.

I could be way off here because I donā€™t play much and never really played SNGs, but isnā€™t ICM push/fold pretty much designed to be GTO play?

so you think that was verbatim and in no way the guy possibly misquoted in a tweet, that would never happen

Oh, thatā€™s definitely possible. I was just telling you what ripdog was referring to. So I guess you should ask him.

Yes but it doesnā€™t cover deep stack/early tourney play at all. Itā€™s a small subset of GTO.