Correct answer would have been: „Considering all your whining, Senator Cruz, I am left with no other possible conclusion than that you are in fact a racist baby.“
8 Likes
What is that baby laying on? A pile of pure racism?
2 Likes
I think it is fascinating that Repulicans are attacking KBJ on being soft on child pornography and seem to celebrate the fact by having a huge drawing of a baby only dressed in diapers in the background.
These people are crazy and the people this is working on are even more crazy.
What exactly is her relation to the book in question?
It may or may not be read by students at a school she’s on the board of in DC.
Watching the clip they are supposedly books taught in the school where she is a board member. There’s no direct relation to her, it’s Cruz just grandstanding about CRT. In a part I chuckled at he said these books at taught at the school where you and your friend are a board member. She said board members don’t deal with curriculum and Cruz says, ok, and then picks up another book and starts reading from it. It’s a packaged speech, it doesn’t really matter what she says as long as she doesn’t say ‘kill whitey’
Man they’re going all the way. They’re going to overturn everything. Clarence Thomas is definitely voting to “leave interracial marriage to the states.”
https://twitter.com/noliewithbtc/status/1506362858321367058?s=21
https://twitter.com/noliewithbtc/status/1506366844885774350?s=21
Anybody have good ideas for how to spruce up your room at a Gulag?
1 Like
You’ve just discovered “WAAF”.
Her and the book are CRT SOCIALISTS!
You’ll be shocked to hear that none of the excerpts he read were actually word-for-word in the book. He paraphrased significantly and took them out of context by a mile. The “Can we send white people back to Europe?” thing that he claims is on page 33 is actually:
At least, that’s one side of the coin. The smooth side. The textured side of Jefferson’s intention was that he basically believed that sending Black people back to where they came from would make America what it was always meant to be in his eyes—a playground for rich White Christians.
Despite the fact that Africans were brought to this land. Enslaved. Drained of their abilities and knowledge of growing and tending crops, exploited for their physical might and creativity when it came to building structures and making meals, stripped of their reproductive agency, stripped of their religions and languages, stripped of their dignity. American soil sopping with Black blood, their DNA now literally woven into the fibers of this land.
I wonder if Black people were thinking, Where can we send you all? Back to Europe? Or maybe instead of sending them, they were thinking more about ending them. It wouldn’t be long before that choice was made for Jefferson.
So the author is wondering if Black people in America in 1826 were thinking it’d be nice to send white people back to Europe. Or to put it another way, the author is wondering if slaves were thinking it sure would be nice to send their oppressor’s back to where they came from so they could be free.
But you can’t beat a nominee over the head with that, now, can you?
1 Like
1619?
That baby looks remarkably like a beardless Ted Cruz
1 Like
My future wife is not white, so instead of just making me really angry and upset like these types of things normally would, this fills me with a murderous rage. It’s a good thing for my future freedom that piece of shit Braun isn’t in the room with me right now.
Looked into the ruling, I didn’t realize that not only could you not get married as an interracial couple in a state that didn’t allow it, if you were married in another state and traveled to a state that banned it, they could arrest you. That’s what happened to the Lovings, and why they sued Virginia.
The ruling in 1967 was 9-0. Nine to fucking zero. And now we’re talking about it possibly being wrongly decided in fucking 2022? By a sitting US senator? Fuck these people. Fuck them all.
When is he going to say the Civil War was wrongly fought and states should be allowed to secede if they want?
Good fucking riddance!
This echoes a recent 5-4 podcast. The 9th amendment (The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.) should be very powerful, but is completely toothless, because judges aren’t willing to actually recognize rights unless they’re enumerated. So you have judges and politicians saying, “Ah yes, of course your rights are not limited to those explicitly laid out in the constitution.” But then, when one of those potential unenumerated rights actually comes up (like the right to use contraception or marry someone of a different race or have an abortion), judges are all, “Oh no, we can’t possibly call that a right - there’s no basis for it in the constitution!”
If you’re going to say there’s no right to an abortion, you’d naturally say that you have no right to contraception or interracial marriage. Those earlier cases are what formed the basis for Roe v. Wade.
1 Like
Are you going to be our guy who knows how to get things?