Manchin is in a Trump +40 state
Murkowski is in a Trump +10 state
Seems like Republicans should be able to get way more conservative Republicans in both instances.
Manchin is in a Trump +40 state
Murkowski is in a Trump +10 state
Seems like Republicans should be able to get way more conservative Republicans in both instances.
Disagree. Most Rs voting for Manchin donāt care about HR1. Just look at Florida voting to let felons vote by a decent margin. The Rs in power know that HR1 ends their power, but lots of average voters would support HR1 is spun correctly.
Edit: not sure how good this poll is, but shows that majority of Rs support HR1.
Iād be interested in seeing polling where people are told that the oppositionās argument is that it helps Democrats and hurts Republicans.
Manchin is totally safe as long as he gives the WV political machine enough cover to keep reelecting him.
WV is a one party state and that party isnāt the GOP or the Democratsā¦ itās a private club run by local oligarchs. Jim Justice is president of that club and Manchin is a lifetime member.
I donāt agree with everything riverman says, but appreciate his takes a lot.
Also, itās just a nonsense framing of the situation. A follow-up question would be āhow have Republicans been cut out? ā there is no answer, because they are getting plenty, in both bills. This infrastructure bill will be chock full of things that will personally benefit Republicans.
He shits on the demE all the time.
Noted shitlib (checks notes) Bernie Sanders, ladies and gentlemen.
I donāt have the skills or desire to spend the time executing this, but Iām envisioning a Pete as Jeb in front of a rainbow-colored US map with 538 votes for Infrastructure.
His having to do this is why Iād sooner slit my wrists than become a politician
What Bernie says can be true, and the criticism from the left can also be true.
The relief bill gives money to people. But that money was all the peopleās money in the first place. Giving us back part of what is rightfully ours is the bare fucking minimum.
Thanks for the band-aid, now letās address the systemic issues that caused the bleeding in the first place. Calling it āthe most progressiveā thing ever means little, because āprogressiveā is so amorphous it can mean anything, progressive has no ideology, instead itās a buzz word.
The best way to address those systemic issues is for Dems to make gains in the mid-term elections so the neither Manchin nor Sinema is the 50th vote in the Senate. Thereās a gap between what the messaging should be to maximize the chances of that happening and what the reality of the situation is.
Some people canāt properly compartmentalize and talk about the bill differently based on the context.
We have a bill that is simultaneously probably close to as progressive as possible given the constraint of who we have in the Senate, certainly closer than what I would have expected, and also nowhere near close to what we need as a country.
shitlib gonna shitlib (check notes) for Joe Biden
Dunno about FL, but apparently this guy is running for senate in NC and is everything you want.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Jackson_(politician)
Jackson served as a Specialist (E-4) during his year-long deployment to Afghanistan. After returning home from his deployment, Jackson entered the ROTC program to become a commissioned officer. Jackson currently works as a business litigator at Womble Bond Dickinson in Charlotte. Jackson also continues to serve in the North Carolina Army National Guard as a captain in the Judge Advocate Generalās Corps.
Jackson faced his first competitive race in 2020. His district had been significantly redrawn and was now a D+2 district, in which a Democratic candidate would only be expected to win by two points. In the final weeks of the campaign, Jackson was called up for National Guard service, preventing him from doing any campaigning during that time. Jackson responded by handing his campaign over to his wife, Marisa, who became the face of the campaign for the closing weeks.[28] Jackson beat Nichols 55% to 41%.
This is my problem with the whole thing and itās straight up propaganda. Itās trying to frame a politician or a bill or an issue as the furthest left that can be achieved so donāt you dare even ask for more.
Shouldnāt they be scouring the state for the Cuban Stacey Abrams?
Literally every single person on this site, and I have seen online, that has argued the stimulus is a good thing has pointed out its obvious limitations at the same time. 100% of them.
It might be the furthest left that can be achieved, but we should dare to ask for more. Is admitting the former an impediment to doing the latter? I donāt think it is.