This is a bad thing???
Make it one of those images that changes when you wear special glasses
1 Like
Cuse, you’ve now posted a wtf video to tell me I’m wrong. But since you again came in at the closing credits and now think you can write a thesis about a movie you haven’t seen, I guess I’ll roll the tape and print out the receipts. It’s really an amazing skill you have to completely distort your ‘opponent’s’ position, and then gaslight like you think you’re in the right. You really should be working for the GOP.
The original two post exchange:
Cuse, feel free to do thing that’s nearly impossible for you to do, admit you’re wrong. There’s no way I can read JT’s post and not think he’s blaming the headline writers. I definitely don’t think he thinks the aggregator wrote the headline.
1 Like
What are the odds Rudy is trying to do only federal crimes?
rip
Pretty sure Danyliuk and Yermak were the two being talked to, but csb.
Context of the entire derail, do you understand it???
How bout we talk about the CONTEXT of how it started as that’s what context means? I didn’t move from my position, and I held him to his original argument. He didn’t keep his original position that I was actually arguing against, and like I said this is another pure refusal to admit you’re wrong about anything.
Tap, tap, tap, case closed
Trump is dropping the ball on the auto (some call them car) insurance issue in Louisiana. This might cause Rispedesred to lose. People in the bayou are tired of the general running roughshod over them.
This is like having a kidnap victim testify in court while the kidnapper holds a gun to their head.
3 Likes
Justice Dept. watchdog tells Russia report witnesses they can’t give written feedback — then reverses course
Nunnehi wins and improves to 97-0 in arguments on Unstuck, thanks for watching today’s installment of Judge Nunn, where nunn always decides who is right, and the context is always limited to the nonsensical version of events that makes his position correct.
Tune in tomorrow when Judge Nunn rules that nunn was right all along that Pelosi and company would fail to move on the Mueller Report.
I’m going to end this idiotic argument of yours right now. The Mueller report impeachment was basically a long term drug sting that would take a long time to settle. They would probably have started substantive stuff after the McGahn case was decided (which still hasn’t been decided yet).
In the midst of this long game sting operation, the perp murdered all the undercover cops in the sting operation and had to be arrested basically neutering the drug sting that’s still going on.
You’re pathetic, man, really really pathetic. It’s easy to think I’m 99% percent wrong, when you are on the other side of every argument with me and refuse to ever admit being wrong about anything (meaning you have a 100% being right streak in your own head). I thought there were rules trying to be decided about endless trolling, but guess not. I’m done with you, and I think a rule should be added so that people like you can be ignored. If not, you really shouldn’t be an admin, and I’m sure you’ll just say for me to make a vote to have you removed (lol).
I talked Microbet into giving me a job installing solar panels but wussed out due to the combination of having to move two-thousand miles and climb on roofs. That said, never meet a 2p2er I didn’t know pre-2p2 IRL.
This is totally detached from your breathless and endless predictions that the wegothim.gif moment was just around the corner. You actually admitted just the other day that Pelosi was doing what myself and others told you she and leadership were doing all along. It’s amazing you can’t just admit that everyone else was right. But then you’d have to reassess your latest round of incredible optimism and consider our analysis that he’s still a heavy underdog to being convicted in the Senate (I might put it at 10%) in the context of accuracy the first time.
I guess at this point you’re almost three years into the presidency and you’ve moved those goalposts a few hundred yards… Might as well keep shifting them now.
This is all you’ve got left. Pound the table and call me some names, it’s a great look for you.
But it’s all you’ve got.
We can roll the tapes of the time I proved you were distorting facts in your claims of what happened on MSNBC within like minutes of finally watching the videos you were telling me proved me wrong, or we can go to the transcripts of you admitting Pelosi was what the rest of us thought she was on impeachment, and we all remember the series of, “They’ll definitely move on this by X date…” Then on X date “Well this other thing changed it but they’ll move by Y…” Then on Y date “Well if they don’t move by Z date I’m done with them.” Then on Z date… 
You followed that trajectory over and over.
I don’t know why you can’t just admit that you’re good at reading all the materials and analyzing what’s there and what SHOULD happen and not so good at predicting what WILL happen when the parties in question are hopelessly inept (D) and Qanon pedaling clowns (R) and the vast majority of voters watch like 15-30 minutes of news per week and couldn’t tell you who Sondland, Taylor, or Zelensky are or that Giuliani is anyone other than a former NYC Mayor who was America’s Mayor after 9/11.
If you would stick to what you were good at, you’d be one of the best posters here. Instead you can’t help but trigger endless arguments as a result of your bad takes, goalpost shifting, and denial of your track record.
2 Likes
And you all wanted to bring the guy who has issues with strong intelligent women over here…
My break time at work comes during the local news and normally its on one of the non Sinclair channels we have which surprisingly shows very little national news. But lately one of the guys has been putting it on a “local” Sinclair channel when he is not watching Judge Judy. Its bad. Full on propaganda…He does not like me busting on them though so hopefully it will stay on the courtroom crap or back to the other local news channel.
Or just use the ignore feature we all are born with and scroll by what you dont want to read and not read it.
2 Likes