This is what appeals courts write when they do not want the Supreme Court to consider the issue. The distinction that the subpoena is to a third party and does not involve significant issues of presidential powers/immunities is a pretty easy way for the Supreme Court not to mess with the case.
"The three-judge appeals panel did not take a position on the president’s biggest argument — that he was immune from all criminal investigations. A lower court had called that argument “repugnant to the nation’s governmental structure and constitutional values.”
Instead, the appeals court said the president’s accounting firm, not Mr. Trump himself, was subpoenaed for the documents, so it did not matter whether presidents have immunity.
“We emphasize again the narrowness of the issue before us,” the decision read. “This appeal does not require us to consider whether the president is immune from indictment and prosecution while in office, nor to consider whether the president may lawfully be ordered to produce documents for use in a state criminal proceeding.”" https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/nyregion/trump-taxes-vance-appeal.html
They would be foolish to take the case. They don’t want Trump’s stench too firmly on long-term decisions about presidential powers.
Yea but isn’t this precisely why Trump’s 2 SC judges were handpicked? So they could protect him from stuff like this? I can see Rapey Beer Lover saying a giant fuck you and saying Trump’s tax returns can’t be touched.
I mean I haven’t read the decision so idk the specifics, but couldn’t SCOTUS just reverse on whatever point the appeals court hung their hat on and remand for the appeals court to answer the question of presidential immunity?
I went to a game when the Nats were in LA for the playoffs and mercilessly booed and heckled Suzuki because I thought there was no more innocuous a player in MLB. My section all joined in and it was, we thought, hilarious.