we got him?
Iâm not saying donât hold them accountable. In fact Iâve said 100 times there is not enough protest and direct action the day after an election.
Iâm saying if your metric for âgood presidentâ means there have been none to date, and cannot be any in the future, then maybe your metric is off.
Then maybe you should abolish the presidency. Itâs not working out well.
I interpreted it as similar to the argument that you can say that people did or said racists things, but that you shouldnât say people are racist.
Or maybe yours that there have been good ones is off. What other president besides Obama were good?
I look forward to writing a cookbook on how to make the best baby sandwiches.
Iâm saying no president has ever, or will ever, be president and not end up doing something considered bad by some part of the left. If having done something bad means a president is bad there will never be good presidents. That seems like an odd metric to apply.
Iâm all for that. Your presidency is a terrible political institution.
To expand on this, the way it works is that people who view politics an an exercise in pushing everything to the left find a couple things that they can heavily slant and repeat them amongst their Twitter bubble until that bubble associates the slant as the core of the presidency.
People have always had trouble imagining things they donât encounter in their day to day life, the problem with social media is it is easier for people to avoid those they disagree with.
VOTER FRAUD itt
I really donât get why I canât think all of our Presidents have sucked. Anyone want to tell me which ones were also good but did some bad things?
FDR (mostly good but internment camps)?
GOAT POTUS. Didnât do anything in office but die.
I wonât speak for everyone, but I respect the heck out of your progressive passion while also being flabbergasted by your tendency to jump straight into âyouâre a centrist who doesnât care about healthcare!â whenever someone mentions applying their vote toward the best chance of defeating Trump.
Progressive commitment and Biden-voting are not mutually-exclusive just because they seem that way to you. I think youâd feel less oppressed by the supposed centrist mob if you werenât so quick to assume weâre all part of it.
It isnât that⌠I think the problem is that, in the context of this specific conversation, it just cedes the argument to a dishonest Right. Trump said Obama was such a horrible president that it led to his election. When the left says, âsure, he was a bad president,â that grants too many BS premises.
For starters, the people who voted for Trump because Obama was such a âbadâ president are not doing so for the reasons progressives might say Obama was deficient. How many people voted for Trump because Obama didnât close Gitmo? How many voted for Trump because Obama continued drone strikes? Iâm going to guess those numbers are close to zero.
They voted for Trump because of Obamaâs âsocialistâ Obamacare. They voted for Trump because under Obama those deviant cross-dressers got to marry each other and use the bathroom with little kids. They voted for Trump because Obama âhurt race relationsâ when he said this country needed to come to grips with its racist past and present.
Anybody who voted for Trump âbecause Obama was a bad presidentâ will cite issues that most progressivesâeven those who would call Obama a bad president, overallâwould say were positives from his presidency. So why are we agreeing with them? Why are we ceding dishonest points?
Iâm fine with taking the NBZ line of agreeing with them to their chagrin. If they say Obama sucked because he approved of gay marriage, say, âYes he sucked because he didnât go far enough. He shouldâve made it mandatory for every person to have a same-sex encounter once per month!â âYes Obummer sucked on race relations; he should have made it illegal for any white person in America to keep more than $1000 in assets!â But of course, that isnât what we do. They say he sucked because X, and we agree that he sucked because Y
And it isnât just the generic conservative âtheyâ weâre talking about. Itâs racist-in-chief donald fucking trump, and weâre going to grant his argument?
I think the thing to do here is not to argue which one was GOOD but which one was LEAST BAD.
That is easy. We will rank them from worst to least worst.
Thoughts on the guy who authorized the first and only use of nuclear weapons in war?
- George Washington
- John Adams
- Thomas Jefferson
- James Madison
- James Monroe
- John Quincy Adams
- Andrew Jackson
- Martin Van Buren
- William Henry Harrison
- John Tyler
- James K. Polk
- Zachary Taylor
- Millard Fillmore
- Franklin Pierce
- James Buchanan
- Abraham Lincoln
- Andrew Johnson
- Ulysses S. Grant
- Rutherford B. Hayes
- James Garfield
- Chester A. Arthur
- Grover Cleveland
- Benjamin Harrison
- Grover Cleveland
- William McKinley
- Theodore Roosevelt
- William Howard Taft
- Woodrow Wilson
- Warren G. Harding
- Calvin Coolidge
- Herbert Hoover
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Harry S. Truman
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
- John F. Kennedy
- Lyndon B. Johnson
- Richard M. Nixon
- Gerald R. Ford
- James Carter
- Ronald Reagan
- George H. W. Bush
- William J. Clinton
- George W. Bush
- Barack Obama
- Donald J. Trump