The Presidency of Donald J. Trump, Episode VII: We Are All Going To Die, Thanks Obama!

https://twitter.com/StuPolitics/status/1258065728089010177?s=19

If you stipulate that, on average, college grad have more wealth and power than non college grads, that would mean the Trump presidency reflects significant minority rule by a less influential and informed segment of society. While probably not unprecedented, it’s a pretty unstable situation. Nevertheless, Trump has governed and pontificated as though he had some kind of popular mandate.

I really want him to live another 10 years to see everything he loves, ie, mainly himself, destroyed.

If Trump had a Dances With Wolves type name it would be Pokes Bears With Sticks.

3 Likes

Pretty amazing trumps accounting firm for his whole life is super shady.

Also beyond the 200 million dollar inheritance Fred fed an additional 400 million dollars to Trump when his businesses were failing. Trump got over 600 million dollars from his dad.

A 2018 Times investigation found that Fred Trump had funneled at least $413 million in current dollars to his son and that the Trumps’ tax-avoidance tactics, all told, had slashed their tax bill by about $500 million.

Latest poll I saw on TV. Trump -20 with women, +2 with men.

Press Secretary is Jenna from 30 Rock?

1 Like

I don’t necessarily have a better answer.

But let’s be clear what question we’re asking.

  • How do we dissuade people from breaking the rules

vs

  • How do we find more effective uses of cruelty to control behavior

I accept that punishing or hurting someone may be the best available option. Wanting to hurt someone, or saying they deserve to be hurt because of what they did, is a far different claim.

I would go a step further to say

  • How do we dissuade people from breaking the rules

vs

  • How do we persuade people to pursue strategies for collaborative well-being

is a further distinction in how I approach the dialogue.

2 Likes

A lot, a lot of damage. And that’s if he loses.

Edit: I should stick to the hypo. District Court judges aren’t a huge deal. Bad judges are bad, but the damage is mainly localized. Bad appeals court judges are bad and harmful, but if Dems had other 2 branches and no filibuster, they could react appropriately. Same thing even with bad SCt judges and, eg, overturning Roe v Wade, etc.

However, I think it was Lincoln who said public sentiment is everything. You can’t have a supreme court realistically endorsing horse and buggy laws when the public all drives cars, they will just be an anacronism, and even the interests supporting them will realize this. Frankly, a conservative Supreme Court in a nation that has mostly gone California ways may not be a huge problem.

Judges are still social animals, with eyes and ears and speaking engagements outside the Federalist Society, with a new set of clerks every year. If Dems have the house and Senate for the next 10 years, much less 20, a lot (maybe 35%) of Trump appointees will conveniently evolve.

2 Likes

Men suck so hard.

Ponied here? Apparently this is real.

I think the GOP thinks they can do literally anything with respect to the judiciary after getting away with Merrick Garland. If Biden wins but Mitch is still in charge of the Senate we will go an entire term with no confirmed Supreme Court justices.

1 Like

No kink shaming

3 Likes

They think that because they can. At the very least, they know that there have been zero consequences for all their fuckery.

1 Like

Funny anecdote, I worked 40 hrs/wk during one semester of law school for academic credit as an “extern” for a federal judge, working in chambers along with his two clerks. He was an older judge, and I don’t think I knew it at the time, but he was high up in the Reagan DOJ and was barely confirmed because he was “too conservative.” Well, this 75 y/o stodgy, “conservative” judge was actually relatively moderate and basically stuck to the law.

Both his full time clerks (recent law school grads) were at least as liberal as me (one, a guy from Berkeley law, was a woman studies grad who was into IP law and pro-Napster [I was into IP law and anti-Napster]), the other was a liberal Jewish woman and future law prof from UMich). The judge was pretty consistently non ideological, invariably hired fairly liberal clerks, and came out on the “correct” side of the few high profile cases he handled.

Now, granted, this federal court was in the Bay Area, and situations will vary, but one of the top 3 concerns of the conservative intelligentsia in the 30 years from 1970-2000 was that many of their appointed judges had “turned” on them. This is why you only see appointments of people like Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh these days, where there’s near certainty that they are “true believers”. However, many of the lower court appointments, even by Trump, are simply strivers who got in with a “bad crowd” (federalist society, religious organizations, senate offices, what have you) and, now that they got a lifetime appointment will want to be thought of as serious within the broader legal community and will curtail their enthusiasm for dipshittery.

edited to add: I suspect that the Trump administration has “radicalized” a good part of the “information” workforce, including lawyers, engineers, doctors, programmers, etc, and there will be long term consequences for policy. McConnell and the GOP made their deal with the devil, “heightening the contradictions,” and the bill will ultimately come due. The Ken Burns Civil War documentary has the story of a South Carolina newspaper publisher who was very pro succession and civil war for a few years prior to the conflict, arguing that it was just, right, and would be easy. Well, he shot himself in the head not long after the surrender. Sometimes it’s better to agitate and reap the rewards of resentment than to actually do battle.

4 Likes

The best people…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-republican-fundraiser-and-trump-ally-to-be-named-postmaster-general-giving-president-new-influence-over-postal-service-officials-say/2020/05/06/25cde93c-8fd4-11ea-8df0-ee33c3f5b0d6_story.html

Looks like Trump’s dead serious about killing off the USPS.

Naw, he is just going Godzilla mode and setting them up to mess with Amazon

pcdC8Br

Just have some guys kick the shit out of McConnell and other shit Republicans and then instant pardon those guys. Just keep doing it until they vote how you want. Out of the hospital? Time it get the shit kicked out of you again.

5 Likes

Gets better. His first try he went in a different direction

IMG_20200506_213937

3 Likes

Like, Trump would probably boost his approval by 5 points if he wrapped himself in the Post Office. He’s gonna alienate some olds who love the mailman by going after them. Trump would go broke operating a donut shop next to a police station.

1 Like

trump does the wrong thing every time and it always works out for him. all of politics has been exposed as total bullshit. the ballots could literally offer two options: i want my life to be better and i want my life to be worse, and the results would still be about 50/50. americans are as bad as can

6 Likes

fucking protesting the government for responding to the pandemic. not to demand better healtchcare and employment benefits, but demanding to go back to the shit lives they had, but now with a contagious disease freely spreading all around them. it’s just the most opposite world i could ever think of, this fuckin country

13 Likes