I’m not believing it.
In what world are voters going to vote for Trump and against Graham?
I said something to this effect about specifically overturning Roe v Wade that I still think I agree with WRT Roberts/maybe Kav. Obviously they’re still GOP hacks.
1 Like
I think this is actually good for whoever the Dem nominee is. I kind of thought HRC shouldn’t have shared the debate stage with him last year. It just gives him credibility that he doesn’t deserve. He also would mop the floor with Mayor Pete, Biden, and Warren. I think Sanders could possibly do well one on one with him and maybe Yang who would simply refuse to acknowledge his antics and stick to facts. It seems so easy to make Trump look like a fool, yet he’s such a boor that attacks sail right over and by him
Let him hold his rallies instead of debating. His audience at these rallies make up a very small percentage of people. Maybe this time we boycott MSM if they give him 24/7 free airtime and allow them to regain their souls by covering the Dem nominee’s town halls
As far as I know, Bernie is the only one who doesn’t have a Trump-issued nickname.
It’s basically a stone cold lock it whatever he eventually comes up with will be anti-Semitic and we will still hear that Bernie is the anti-Semite because he once vaguely said Palestinians deserve some sort of human rights.
1 Like
Not necessarily. He can just call him the Heart Attack Handout Hamburgler who is coming to take away your juicy beef burgers and it will stick.
Or he can just call him “Old, Sick Bernie” and everyone will get to thinking that yeah Bernie’s pretty old and, well, maybe he’s sick, and gee whiz when you compare him to the paragon of virility that is Donald Trump, it does really seem like wow we can’t really put a guy with a stent into the White House, can we? What would that project to the world? Oh and he’s Jewish. That doesn’t matter, of course, well maybe to the racists but not me I have authentic reasons.
Shouldnt Trump then be happy about the impeachment? Why is he whining about it 24/7?
1 Like
I’d like to think that Peter Baker knows better, but this comes out as some pure, uncut both-sidesing:
Robert Costa: The bigger question is where is the truth. There’s the Durham report, the IG report. Where is the truth?
Peter Baker: Well the problem is, there is no truth. There is no single truth any more. I mean, there is, but that’s not how this political system operates any more. Everybody has their own…there are different ways of looking at this report, everybody’s going to pull it out. If you listen to Fox, if you listen to MSNBC. But more broadly, I mean even just listening to the impeachment hearings you heard this week, right, you heard a very starkly different versions of reality. You listen to the president talk, what he says at times has very little bearing on, you know, the fact set that you would hear from the Democrats. And, getting them on the same page is really, really, probably impossible in this day and age. We’re so atomized, so polarized in not just in our politics, but in our media, in our social interactions, that we live in these separate universes, and they don’t meet.
Hey Peter, “the fact set that you would hear from the Democrats” is also known as “the facts”.
One. 
Side. Is. Right.
3 Likes
When Jill Stein is dunking on you…
6 Likes