Are Harry/Meghan billionaires?
Anyway the answer is almost certainly no. Oprah has definitely interviewed Bill Gates before.
1 Like
You would think they wouldn’t gather like that if only to ensure the security of homo sapiens point-oh-oh-oh-oh-one percenticus.
1 Like
And Cohen closed with a prediction that Weisselberg will flip on Trump. “He’s not going to let his boys go to prison,” he said, “and I don’t think he wants to spend his golden years in a correctional institution, either.”
FYI, article doesn’t really discuss Georgia. More related to the post by @hey_you.
Never, ever, fucking ever forget.
https://twitter.com/markknoller/status/1306586684935503872?s=21
4 Likes
Even if you get a 1099-c you just fill out form 982 and check “insolvency” and poof like that it’s not taxable.
2 Likes
wtf
nobody cared about the trumps stealing money from kids with cancer but they also stole money from dogs in shelters
2 Likes
Just the absolute fucking worst
2 Likes
probably not even in the top 1000 shittiest things these turds have done but when it comes to nailing them to the wall you go to war with the army you have
4 Likes
right but in terms of things people are supposed to care about if kids with cancer or dogs doesn’t work what the **** would
I am assuming theres some tax fraud involved here
https://mobile.twitter.com/mrjamesob/status/1370696240380383236
Associated Newspapers’ lawyers complained about a montage in the show that purported to feature headlines from British newspapers. They argue that the CBS special showed images that had been doctored or presented as headlines when they were not. They called for the images to be removed from the interview online and before it is repeated tonight.
“Many of the headlines have been either taken out of context or deliberately edited and displayed as supporting evidence for the programme’s claim that the Duchess of Sussex was subjected to racist coverage by the British press. This editing was not made apparent to viewers and, as a result, this section of the programme is both seriously inaccurate and misleading,” Associated Newspapers’ group legal director Elizabeth Hartley said.
Associated Newspapers lists three examples in its letter, arguing that the most “egregious” was an image containing the headline: “Meghan’s seed will taint our Royal Family.” The company said this was an edited version of the original headline, which reported on the suspension of a UKIP member over her racist texts about Markle. UKIP is a UK political party. The original headline was: “Meghan’s seed will taint our Royal Family’: UKIP chief’s glamour model lover, 25, is suspended from the party over racist texts about Prince Harry’s wife-to-be.”
“I should be grateful for your urgent confirmation that the offending content will be removed from the programme currently being made available to the public. We also understand that a further broadcast is being planned tonight. The montage should therefore be deleted prior to that broadcast.”
Attorney Hartley said: “It is a thoroughly dishonest misrepresentation of a newspaper headline and article which was the opposite of racist. No one viewing the programme would have understood this from the montage.”
3 Likes
Daily Fail not racist once!
3 Likes
Curious to how a headline can be taken out of context.
3 Likes
If the lawyer’s claim is correct then the headline was deceptively edited in a way that makes it look like "Meghan’s seed will taint our Royal Family” is the daily mail speaking instead of quoting somebody else.
1 Like
I get that - a headline being edited etc - in this case they did leave the quotes in by the look of it but left off the second half.
What I was puzzled by was that if a headline is unedited can it ever be “out of context”?
Either way the Daily Mail can go fuck themselves for writing clickbait “headlines” in the first place - awful rag that the world would be better off without.
2 Likes