The recipient doesn’t actually have that money yet. If they try to sell 5.7 billion worth of $SHIB the price will do a Space Shuttle Columbia. It’s worth a ton of money but there is no way you can realize anything like 5.7 billion on that.
Edit: Although looking at the market cap and trading volume, you could get several billion from it, probably.
How is the market cap of this thing $31 billion? That’s $100 for every man, woman and child in the United States. Bizarre.
i know it’s a stupid word to use, but i just find this immoral. apes selling for 5m dollars, a parody of a joke coin is worth 31 billion dollars. i’m sure you can butwhatabout some fiat stuff and wall street bullshit and sure, but it’s still awful
So thats number 8500 of 10000, right? But its just a copy of an online piece of art, right? Like, somebody created this and used the MS paint fill tool to make the fur gold on 100 of the 10000, and now its somehow worth millions?
Fucking why? It doesnt make any fucking sense. Can I create something with 10000 identical copies except for one that has a digital cum stain and that will net me 800 million?
i mean dude you have to realize at this point we heard these arguments, right?
there’s a full discord of UPers who are billionaires now from buying jpegs.
Millions of dollars have been made off NFTs just between UP members. Yes it is absurd but isn’t everything these days? Fighting these trends almost never works out. Look at TSLA for example.
Also at least 4 UP people have BAYC apes that I know of lol.
fwiw i find the beetlejuice type arguments to be more on the stupid side and easily refutable for the most parts. monetary wise he’s a genius, same as the dude who bought all shibs with his doge winnings. it doesn’t make the arguments any better, just makes them rich and me poor.
serious answer there are plenty of low effort projects from nobodies that get no attention and make zero money. same as there are middling/bad artists who make art and don’t make a living out of it.
if picasso painted a single dot on a canvas and said it’s meaningful, i think enough picasso art fans out there would have it mean something to them and it might spread out into the culture if it hits at the right time for the public’s sensibilities
and nfts aren’t limited to artworks, nfts could be a club pass or a concert ticket, it’s like there are tons of pieces of paper on file at the county clerk’s office and they mean different things. just standing or building on land doesn’t mean you own it, you own it because your piece of paper is filed properly in the clerk’s office. so it’s not a new concept but it’s a new application, a decentralized internet
I mean is it really any more or less silly than the poker boom? I’d argue NFTs probably make more sense and are more fun. Also people love gambling and the NFT world is a supercharged version of a casino.