Here’s a specific example. I made this post not directed at sabo:
To which he replied:
Notice the edit of my post, removing “reverse cargo” so he can claim I’m being condescending.
Anyone interested can follow the dreary exchange from there. But basically I start out giving him the benefit of the doubt, then eventually just end up muting the thread for the sake of my blood pressure. So sabo wins by just spewing paragraphs that look on the surface like a real argument - but really just amount to asserting that capitalism and police can never be reformed - over and over.
He refuses to ever state what his alternative for capitalism (but we know form other threads it involves not voting), and he doesn’t answer any of my points.
I don’t think he actually gives a shit about police brutality except as a useful tool to get to the revolution he dreams of leading someday. It’s pretty clear he keeps trying to establish a premise about capitalism by hitching it onto the sky-high emotions swirling around police brutality at the time.