Phil’s playing a series of high stakes HU challenges over the next few months, generally €100/€200 PLO. Opponents include Bill Perkins, Jungleman, Brandon Adams and maybe Luke Schwartz, plus some guys that IDK because lol following poker these days.
I listened to a podcast recently where they discussed this. Galfond is laying 4 to 1 to a couple of people that have training sites and less to others. I guess it’s to show that he’s the only true PLO master.
I play a lot of PLO. While I have very little HU experience, I dont think a solver matters too much. All a program like that will do is tell you how to best play your hand vs a range. But, by “playing your hand” it will just spit out % of the time you should bet pot vs half pot vs check etc.
While this is obviously useful, you have to play a ton of hands to realize the proper equity of playing “perfectly” vs a PLO range with so many hand combos.
Afaik it isnt, but I don’t keep up to date on that stuff well enough. The difference in skill of him playing Perkins, who I would be a big favorite over and some of the big plo pros is massive as well.
Downswings dont actually work like this. It’s what gives the fish hope that their bad play was just bad luck. Phil knows this.
It’s either that his opponent is just straight up owning him or that Phil isn’t aware of some new developed software that that has been timed to perfection.