This is a good idea. I asked her about it and she said she’d think about it and was super appreciative. She was saying a lot of people still have it much worse than her so she’d feel bad, plus I think it would hurt her pride. She didn’t want to accept the money from me either.
I’ve gotten 3 promotions at my current company; if I am adjusting my resume do I put all 3 as separate sections or just put the current position? They are all the exact same job just different titles.
Edit: tagging @MysteryConman on this as I assume he might have some valuable insight.
These days with resumes generally a lot of tjem are screened by people that don’t really know very much (the dreaded “Talent Acquisition” team). You can improve your chance of getting an interview just by using a ton of words from the job posting in your resume.
This is going to vary by position but by far the biggest game changer IMO is have a story to tell for every question. Every answer should be framed as “that question reminds me of a time when …” and then you tell a story about a relevant situation, what you did, and how that resulted in a good outcome.
All true but it is a filter of how much they care. You are allowed mistakes once you have the job. Not on first impression. Now of course, if I have other reasons to like someone I am not tossing them due to a typo. I’m talking about having to wade through hundreds of faceless applications.
I personally try to give a break to a candidate where they have, like, one typo. I’m supposed to ( and do) care about diversity at our company and getting absolutist about typos is a bit unfair IMO to people where English is their second language. In Toronto that’s a lot of candidates.
Yes. I started as a junior position with minimal responsibilities. Mostly in the development sector. Then I was promoted to a senior title with specific project duties including $1B+ total in work. Finally, I was promoted to manager with 3 people under me. I assume I should break it out like that to show a clear difference in each.