On this issue I am a low-information voter. I don’t post much and I’m not confrontational so I have never been moderated. I also don’t follow the forum drama and I am only vaguely aware of (e.g.) why some people don’t like Wookie.
I didn’t see any evidence presented in this thread that would disqualify anyone from being a mod. I don’t have the energy to search other threads.
To take one example, I find Keed’s arguing style to be somewhat passive-aggressive and annoying. But he seems to be pretty calm and I have no reason to think he’d be a bad mod.
SUBob claims he will be unfair. I think unfairness is fine if he is unfair in fair ways. I kind of want to see it. I assume he won’t just be throwing darts. I think some of the politics threads could use a little tough love. I have no patience for bad faith posting. Maybe some unfairness is required.
The funny thing about English grammar is that it’s actually much simpler than most other languages (no gender, minimal cases, pragmatic sanction to disregard mood, etc.), but orthography is so insanely fucked up that it’s extremely hard to learn anyways.
Kinda torn on keeed. I think he would make good moderation decisions, but I’m concerned that he wouldn’t be able to constructively “lead” the forum on moderation issues due to personality conflicts.
Also bitterly disappointed to get to the end of this thread and find out that I can’t vote for d2. Just legendary posting in this thread.