the people asking for his ban
Whatâs the point of this forum then. A circle jerk?
just speaking for myself but assume others feel the same way, we are fine with debating, this isnât a debate.
I see a debate there and I see him debating. What do you see?
He is allowed to be wrong about his point of view. What does it say about you lot if you canât explain to him why his position is so bad?
Maybe we should be banning the whole lot of you as well for being totally shit in failing to explain why child exploitation is bad.
It says very little, given how unwilling or unable he seems to articulate an actual position. We have fragments of a position â sixteen-year-olds arenât âkidsâ, women are manipulable and can use intimidation as a defence against murder, air traffic controllers etc. When pressed, he just starts rambling about Clinton and Dersh.
I agree, otoh if I canât tell if serious or trolling itâs trolling, so it wants containing at the very least.
Ok thatâs a more reasonable point imo.
I just want all this dumb shit to go away so the forum can focus on being a resource people value rather than a constant source of childish arguments.
Well looks like he finally passed out.
The character has changed. Itâs turning into a pile on for the unreasonable yanks vs foreigners who donât toe the line forum (except Churchill who was bonkers tonight). Most decent yanks stay away from threads where this is happening.
Sure man, itâs not the guy defending a universally disagreed with take to the bitter end, itâs everybody who disagreed with him thatâs the problem.
For the 10,000th time, itâs not universally agreed if other countries didnât see it that way because of linguistic differences.
I donât see how this is so difficult to understand.
Two threads now plus Epstein, and counting. Three threads counting someone abusing lapka because his mansplaining position couldnât accommodate her refusal to be a victim for the rest of her life, p,us Epstein.
So yes, spreading equals changing.
as a lifelong Braves fan I am deeply offended by this characterization and demand a retraction or perhaps a duel or is it âdualâ I always mix those up
We could make it a best of two in which case it would be a dual duel.
Sorry, shouldnât have brought it up itt.
Funny how you keep trying to make this a USA patriotism thing yet you were the first person to defend the UK guy caping for other UK pedophiles.
Wrong thread for this ffs. First try answering my question in the actual thread about the guys post that you blew up at for reasons no one understands (I want to).
Honestly think we need to try turning it off and back on again. Or roll it back two days. This has been incredibly embarrassing for a lot of people.