Agreed. Incels are not just physical monsters.
I find that hard to believe. “Hot” is a high bar. It would be nice if we had more straight women around to confirm this.
I didn’t read the whole thing, but there are more than a few people in that thread saying that he was 5’9". How tall was he?
He reminds me of the Dennis character in it’s always sunny in Philadelphia.
Why is it hard to believe? I’m surprised that you think being ugly is highly correlated with being an incel. These things have almost nothing to do with one another.
Yeah, I don’t know what to tell you, it’s very hard to swallow. I’m operating under the assumption that women like to bang “hot” dudes and will overlook quite a bit at least for a one night stand.
Women like to bang hot dudes, and confident dudes, and funny dudes, and rich dudes, and dudes that play guitar, and dudes that bring them breakfast in bed, and dudes that just happen to be in the room. Humans like to bang.
I’d put a whole host of factors way above attractiveness if we are predicting whether someone will be an incel: alcoholic or abusive Dad, mens’ rights curious, Joe Rogan fan, parents with an anxiety disorder, UP moderator. The list is very long.
I 100% agree that ugliness is not a necessary or sufficient condition to be an incel. But at the other end of the spectrum, if one is “hot” they almost can’t be one even if they check the other boxes. Someone will bang them despite all the negatives. Because they are “hot”.
The problem for most incels is they don’t interact with humans. No one will bang you if you don’t leave the house.
This may have been a significant barrier in the past. But now if you’re “hot” just put up a couple photos on Tinder and you’re good to go. Incels normally spend enough time on a computer to know that to be the case.
Hot take: not all incels are virgins
But if the hot dude is awkward and creepy they can simply bang a different hot dude. A big problem with incels is their feeling of entitlement to attention and sexual favors.
“Hot dudes” are by definition uncommon. Finding another one to bang isn’t simple.
‘Incel’ still stands for involuntarily celibate, right?
Google says that he is 5’9".
Why is it hard to believe? I’m surprised that you think being ugly is highly correlated with being an incel. These things have almost nothing to do with one another.
Do you have some kind of citation to back this up or is it just your gut instinct?
Men who say they’re 5’9" are 5’6". Men who say they’re 6’0" are 5’9"
Women like to bang hot dudes, and confident dudes, and funny dudes, and rich dudes, and dudes that play guitar, and dudes that bring them breakfast in bed, and dudes that just happen to be in the room. Humans like to bang.
I’d put a whole host of factors way above attractiveness if we are predicting whether someone will be an incel: alcoholic or abusive Dad, mens’ rights curious, Joe Rogan fan, parents with an anxiety disorder, UP moderator. The list is very long.
That was stealthy. Missed it the first time around.
Do you have some kind of citation to back this up or is it just your gut instinct?
Are you asking for an empirical study of who is hot and who is not? I think there was a pre-Zuck website along those lines.
No, I am asking for an empirical study of whether not physical appearance is correlated to male virginity (your claim).