I mean it’s not fun to point out but the party basically conspired to nominate a functioning corpse and is doing everything in its power to nuke legitimately popular progressives, all while continuing to vacuum corporate cash and monumentally fuck up the virus relief negotiations.
A competent Democratic party would be sounding the alarm bells nonstop over Trump dismantling the post office. This is absolutely basic shit, everyone likes having a functional post office. Even the small government Republicans in the Villages want to send letters and packages and shit. Nevermind that this is a blatant dismantling of our democracy, no one was like “Fuck, I hate the US postal system, I hope it gets dismantled.”
Giving AOC a minute is meh. Honestly I’m surprised they let her in at all. I’m hoping that the all-star of the Twitch generation can do a lot with 60 seconds.
But what is Bill Clinton doing there? Who is the audience for that? How does this help the party? Are we all supposed to pretend we didn’t watch the Netflix documentary on Epstein and didn’t see pictures of Bill flying off to Pedo Island?
And Hillary? OK, I know that there’s a contingent of women who really wanted to see the glass ceiling shattered. I’m not a woman so maybe I don’t fully grasp the significance of that. But FFS, you spent 20 years positioning yourself to be President and you lost to the host of NBC’s The Apprentice. Go away, nobody likes you. Collect your family and depart. We’re not voting for your daughter either.
I understand letting Kasich speak, tbh. When the Romans would conquer Celtic tribes they would parade their chieftains across the city like prized caged animals. Make the silly little NeverTrumper do some tricks onstage like a pet monkey, that’s a solid power move.
Then don’t give her any time at all. Giving her 60 seconds (assuming that most of the other speakers are not going to be similarly limited, which, tbf, I don’t know) seems like the worse possible solution. It elevates her in a way that lets the R’s say, “see, we told you that AOC has taken over the party, she got a speaking slot at the convention!” without giving her enough time to actually persuade people who might like her if they were introduced to a deeper version of her and her ideas.
If the theory is that AOC would be popular if people knew her better, then give her a chance to prove it. If the theory is that her and her ideas only play well in her super liberal district and the rest of the country hates her, then don’t put her up there at all. 60 seconds just seems like some sort of splitting the baby half measure that will leave everybody mad, and they should have known that.
The only thing I can think of that is close to this is when the eDems leaked a party poll that AOC was very unpopular with “key swing voters” which turned out to be Midwestern whites with no college, i.e. Trumps base.
My impression from the last time I dove into the numbers was that AOC was generally more popular than other nationally prominent members of Congress and had a wider base of people who were strongly favorable towards her.
It’s pre recorded isn’t it? I love the idea that we should limit AOC to 60s beasue she’s not widely popular. What about the person so hated that she lost a popularity contest to a fat, racist, child molesting moron who no longer has a concept of object permanence? She gets an hour.