This is a good opinion
He comments on his tweet:
https://x.com/eastbaycitizen/status/2043173023738650804
I mean, you canât write âSwalwell is a woman abuserâ stories without some hard evidence, and when that evidence needs to be stories from victims and they donât want to go public, heâs a bit stuck.
I tend to blame the people who gave him endorsements and worked on his campaign etc, because you can just not do those things without potentially needing to defend your position in court.
Adam Schiff for one
Thatâs fine, but post hoc football spiking should probably be less flamboyant
But if he reported it, he would have lost all that inside access where they totally tell him and leak to him real true for real things and not whatever would result in whatever headline they wanted to see or test
Anti gay bigot shithead
that escalated quickly!
And article on the behind the scenes work that went on that lead to Stalwellâs fall
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/13/influencers-allegations-eric-swalwell-00869517
QUICK.
Still, the rumors circulated enough that power brokers were compelled to bring them up to Swalwell directly. In endorsement interviews and over meals, he was asked if there was anything to the chatter, anything in his past that could damage not only him, but his supporters. Swalwell insisted there was not. He told people he was one of Trumpâs favorite targets; surely, if there were any skeletons in his closet, the presidentâs MAGA legion would have found them.
âI asked Eric a lot of questions, and people that were close to him questions: Is there anything? You donât have to tell me what,â said Ian Calderon, a former state lawmaker who ended his own campaign for governor in March and endorsed Swalwell. âI told him, âThere are no secrets in politics, and if there is something, it will come out.â He was indignant and adamant.â
lol
âFollow me around. I donât care. Iâm serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. Theyâd be very bored.â - Gary Hart
Democrats should âcreditâ and embrace once-staunch Republican supporters of President Donald Trump who have now grown more critical of him.
I wonder why âcreditâ is in quotes and âembraceâ isnât.
Maybe she actually used the word âcreditâ but didnât actually say âembraceâ? Donât really feel like hunting her exact words down.
That is correct. She said credit, but the writer and headline writer thought embrace was better because they think it makes Omar look bad.
âEmbraceâ is also shorter than âput our arms aroundâ, which she actually did say.
She didnât say âput our arms around Greeneâ.
I think Mediaite is a generally left-leaning site (within the American context) that sees âembraceâ as a positive rather than negative term in this story.
We got him!