Where did you read that? That’s the third time I have seen D brought up with the Epstein murder today.
I’m pretty sure it’s just people in this thread. Not an actual news source or anything (I don’t think).
I saw the other two references to that on two different sites tho.
bro, you missed such an elite opportunity to post “Who the fuck is D’Angelo Barksdale” I don’t even know what to say *
- Yes, I know it’s Avon, woteva.
Sounds a lot like the fellowship, Doug Coe and the boys down at C street.
Specifically that some people are born to lead and thus are infallible.
1 Like
Not too surprising. It’s a well known pop culture reference to a dude who gets killed in prison and it’s made to look like a suicide. Perfectly germane to the discussion and not surprising that multiple people would think of it independently.
Seems he was a MAS*H fan at least
Nice to see the media “playing stupid” once again, and blasting the “news”/Trump’s theory that the Clintons killed Epstein everywhere. They love them some Trump. At this point, it’s irresponsible journalism to either not turn it back at Trump as hard as possible or ignore it all together. If you think “Trump doing outrageous thing” is news you can’t ignore then gotta “both sides” him in your headline, I.e. “Trump had extensive and well-documented ties to pedophile Epstein and his administration is responsible for his death, nonetheless Trump retweets theory that Clintons are responsible.”
2 Likes
Instead it is headlines that Barr is shocked that Epstein died, and vows to get to bottom of it. Next headline, Trump retweets “unsubstantiated/without evidence” theory that the Clintons did it. These “journalists” are pretending they actually believe that people will be shocked and outraged that Trump is presenting an “unsubstantiated/without evidence” theory, when they know damn well that all they are really doing is help spread the Clinton murder theory for some cheap clicks, exactly as Trump wants.
2 Likes
They’ve sped ahead in [strike]severity of retardation[/strike] conspiratorial aptitude over at chiefsplanet, and have ‘advanced’ the discussion to include impostor corpses.
Just providing perspective
carry on
1 Like
woah. first blank post? :)
1 Like
The MCC holds 765 prisoners. NY Post reports that the last successful suicide there was in 1998.
We hadn’t had a hijacking in this country prior to 9-11 in quite some time either.
Don’t bother yourself with actual thought, when a juicy sensational anecdotal intoxicant is within arm’s clicking reach.
2 Likes
Do you even deep state?
My theory at least is that his release from suicide watch was the result of external pressure. He has ample reason to kill himself, I don’t have trouble believing he did so. The fact that it was allowed to happen, in the face of an earlier attempt and a pressing need to prevent it, is extremely suspicious.
Epstein’s last encounter with prosecutors resulted in a series of rules being bent or broken in an extremely obvious way. I mean I like Hanlon’s razor and all, but anyone not giving serious thought to the possibility that the same thing happened again is frankly thick. Simple incompetence is also a possibility, as is him getting murdered, though I’ll want some more evidence before I consider that as likely as a facilitated suicide.
Wasn’t Chelsea Manning kept naked in solitary confinement for 6 months or something because of supposed suicide watch?
When I got a DUI, the Hermosa Beach jail made me take off my $1 friendship bracelet I got in Peru.
How was there no report about the first “suicide attempt” whatsover? Oh the jail doesn’t talk about these things. Sure ok. I guess that’s a dead end - no point rattling sabres or following up demanding to know what happened.
And now this. What in the actual fuck?
When I got drunk and got put in the drunk tank they still took my shoelaces
It’s still a huge conspiracy if they let him kill himself - which sure seems likely.
Does he have anyone he actually cares about that they could have threatened? Mother still alive maybe?
1 Like