That doesn’t make sense to me. Ianal and all but how can an agreement like this be valid when it involves a crime?
The accused are rich. The end.
I mean this person could have just voted not guilty but I still find this amusing
https://twitter.com/business/status/1479217677721874436?s=21
Dersh is the kind of terrible liar character you’d see in a sketch comedy piece.
They’ve had their 1000 year reich - they can fuck off now.
5 Likes
The Royals don’t seem to believe their boy.
1 Like
Now I’m beginning to wonder how long Prince Andrew will remain among us… 
1 Like
He could take his brother with him.
Jizzlane’s going to get a new trial imo, and she should. Apparently the juror lied on the form and then talked about his sexual abuse in the jury room, basically testifying to the rest of the jury about his experience and how it relates to the case. The conspiracy theorist in me thinks, what a great way to buy off a juror, he both generates and invalidates the verdict. Brilliant.
And the juror should be prosecuted for perjury.
Juror misconduct very rarely leads to convictions being overturned. It’s possible in this case, but it’s rare generally.
And there’s no way this juror gets prosecuted for perjury IMO regardless of what happens with this verdict.
Um. yeah. Dick Wolf has shown me over and over and over that this does happen. Duh.
1 Like
I’ll bet he gets to keep the hat in private and will still wear it when he has sex with teenagers, maybe sometimes he will slyly have them wear it in bed too, and then everyone will have a good laugh.
1 Like
NPR dude yesterday made the point that bc of their hereditary nature, Andrew’s titles and whatever else goes with being a prince can’t really be taken away. He’s just agreed not to use them, which means nothing.
Does he at least no longer get his stipends?
I’ve played enough Crusader Kings to know that these titles could definitely be taken away if the Queen really wanted to.
2 Likes