As for the rest of it… I don’t mind discussing it, but it probably needs its own thread.
Look man if you want to talk more about this actual subject fine. But I’ve explained what I meant and if you think I ascribed more than what Clovis 8 meant in his post I mean who cares? Clovis 8 isn’t interested in clarifying what he said why do you care so much? It’s odd!
That’s one way to curb population growth.
1 Like
I clarified, he "this"ed. Why do you keep insisting he clarify when he clarified? It’s odd!
I mean it’s well known he’s a fervent Sam Harris style anti-religion zealot. So when he’s saying that he knows God doesn’t exist because of science it’s obvious what his angle is. That’s why he doesn’t actually want to discuss it, because that is of course what he thinks.
OK I created a new topic: God and Religion
Why don’t you post your thesis there, because I don’t want to mischaracterize you.
2 Likes
I have some thoughts on that Keeed religion post as well…would be interested to participate if Clovis is in there with his anthropology experience.
https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1179851099978846209
Crossposting from the “Who will run in 2020?” thread
3 Likes
Not me.
Perfect response
FUFUFUFUUFUFU Chrome FU straight to hell!
I literally had to take out the s, then somehow it figured it out
RAAAAAAAGEEEE
Go ahead - tell me why LDO it should be “ible” and not “able” because reasons and I will find you and cut you.
2 Likes
Evergreen statement
1 Like
discernible (adj.)
also discernable, “perceptible, visible, observable,” 1560s, from French discernable, from discerner “distinguish (between), separate” (see discern). Form with -a- was more common at first; spelling changed to -i- 17c. to conform to Late Latin discernibilis. Related: Discernibly.
Even dumber explanation than I expected.
https://mobile.twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/1179858705686388741
Lol avanatti under multiple indictments and filing a civil lawsuit that opens him to disclosure.
Just when my rage was subsiding.
Mandela Effect imo