It’s like, tell me you know nothing about US government without telling me you know nothing about US government. Yeah, the omnibus bills are stupid, but it’s where republicans have taken us. The alternative is nothing. There is no “pass small spending bills to keep things running.”
His etch-a-sketch understanding of the twitter code base is exponentially better than his understanding of government.
I hate this line so much. It’s basically a stand-in for “someone who doesn’t have a following”. Who gives a shit if some random person in a comment section has a a bunch of followers or a sufficiently personalized username?
At least in my experience, yes and no. Bot/troll accounts tend to have such names, but I see it invoked a lot as a “how dare someone like you criticize my take” in a very high schoolish way. We’re deep in some comment section, who gives a shit.
Maybe. For years I only used Twitter for stuff like checking what’s going on with a rain delay at a sporting event and stuff like that.
When I started using it as a source for info and sometimes engaging I didn’t bother changing my username (I’m literally just a random guy anyway) and I’d get that reply in threads about college football etc.
How the fuck do such idiots get to be bosses in the first place. I mean, Elon is an outliar and we know how he got where he is. But what’s the story for the “regular” idiot bosses?
I think one of the things Musk failed to understand is that Fox only survives due to cable carriage fees.
Almost all right wing media in the US is subsidized because it’s toxic to advertisers, who (mostly) don’t want to associate with 24/7 fear and outrage and who would prefer to market to young people with money.
Sure, you can turn the dial up on right winger shit, but you can’t do that and have a profitable social media site.