I’d love to see what we can learn from the convergence of variables around Musk. Even if it was all accidents and serendipity, we can learn a little about how to do those things deliberately next time.
Most Google searches on political related topics, the “Top Stories” section is left wing MSM links. Which is fine.
Type in Hershel Walker and its mostly left wing MSM. Type in Jim Baker and all the “Top Stories” are all right wing outlets. Given this is a such a major, timely part of such a major, timely news story, a very interesting demarcation.
I dont even know where the quote you provided comes from. It certainly doesn’t show up on a Google search for “Jim Baker”
Sure Elon has perfectly cromulent technical skills but he is clearly a Trumpian level liar, conman and scumbag. Those traits, massive risk tolerance and massive luck are clearly the “secrets” to his success.
Safe to assume you are also a subscriber to the original Trump Derangement Syndrome as well? Dude did become the most powerful man in the world.
FYI, Garner’s Modern English Usage labels the use of beg the question for invite the follow-up question [essentially raise the question] at Stage 4 of 5 on the Language-Change Index.
I will not give in to the improper use of “beg the question” in this lifetime. It’s an important concept that needs its own phrase. (I guess people could say, “assuming what you’re trying to prove,” but that’s an uncommon and fairly clunky phrase. (PVNs use was obv. correct.)
OTOH, it’s useful that “beg the question” is often misused, as it indicates the speaker has at best limited familiarity with philosophy.
If I’m remembering right, “begging the question” refers to when you’re using dumb circular reasoning to make people keep asking you followups over and over again. “Why do you like squirrels?” “Because they’re awesome.” “Okay well why are they awesome?” “Because they’re really cool.” “Ok fine, but why are they…”
Basically any time you’re saying “it _____s the question” and then there’s an actual question afterward, you meant “raises”.
I think it comes up much significantly when someone is making a complex argument and they basically “smuggle” the conclusion into a premise, often by using ambiguous language. It can be a “dumb” error, but it can also be a very deep error.
I mean language evolves and different meanings become acceptable, irregardless of whether you like it or not. It used to literally melt my brain, but now I could care less.