Donald J Trump: Rip Van Winkle edition

Out on bail while appealing conviction, take office, self-pardon. Note ianal.

1 Like

lol, we’re all just as confused here as your average joe. Seems like he always wriggles out of these jams but this time it’s not clear how.

1 Like

I’m actually seeing some kind of a plea rather than a pardon which results in him not running for office. I don’t think his heart is in it this time anyway. He’s only running as a shield from being convicted. I think if he knows he can get away with a plea (even a no-contest plea) to some lesser charge, which avoids jail, then he’s taking it. At least that would make sense, which is a good argument for why he won’t do it. I guess.

2 Likes
2 Likes

well, he’s running because he’s a narcissist and it gives him attention and definitely also the part where you really can’t grift harder than running for potus.

1 Like

Also why would be plea. He didn’t do anything wrong.

1 Like

Evidence is overwhelming but still at least only 50/50 due to lol Florida jury nullification.

Just to nitpick, jury nullification would mean 12/12 jurors agreeing to completely ignore the evidence and declare him not guilty, which I think is unlikely even in lol Florida (although there’s the factor of Cannon ruling every piece of evidence inadmissible or something so they legitimately acquit as a result of what they’re given). Hung jury due to one or two assholes is much more likely, and then there’s the question of whether the DOJ bothers to try again or just lets it drop at that point.

Anyone know any real independents in 2023?

With the possibility of him winning the election and pardoning himself, none still has to be the favourite.

1/12 to be hung is what I meant. I guess technically not the full definition of nullification but hung does mean not convicted which in MAGA world means INNOCENT and EXONERATED!!!

No. Any independents are plants designed to hurt one side. Most likely stealth for the right. No idea if a Cheney third party run could pull votes away from a MAGA nominee.

Practically these are binary elections. Vote appropriately.

Can’t they request a new judge, which is ruled on by a different judge? It would be insane if Canon is legit the judge for this trial after what happened before with her.

There have been various lawbro opinions about why/how she’ll either have to wind up recusing, or will get bitch-slapped into compliance by higher courts if she pulls any stupid shit, but as usual those need to be taken with like a 20lb grain of salt.

But he can’t pardon himself out of convictions on state charges. Assuming convictions in the two state cases are independent events and UP opinion is a good estimate of the probability of conviction, 0.30+0.29-(.30)(.29)= 0.50.

So :man_shrugging:

I think there’s a decent chance she recuses just because she doesn’t need this shitshow in her life. The idea that she’s going to get a Supreme Court gig out of this is fantasy, Trump probably will not be President again, there probably won’t be a vacancy if he is, and he doesn’t reward people who help him anyway.

It’s one thing to be a Trump slappy, another thing to stake your career on a quixotic attempt to defuse an open-and-shut indictment, for a guy who famously chucks all his allies under the bus at some point. I think she’s an underdog to voluntarily wash her hands of this, but not a big underdog.

2 Likes
1 Like

I think any rational judge would do this, and if she doesn’t do it (and I doubt she will because she has already issued an order in the case), it just means she’s in the bag for Trump.

Ironically, if she recuses herself, she does not need to, and if she doesn’t, then she does.

Why would it hurt her career at all? Republicans don’t care about them being good judges. They want them to tow the line and enforce rules for the rich and powerful. Her last go round helping Trump was so outrageous I don’t think anyone will ever consider her a serious judge anyways.

Only reason it might hurt her career is if Republicans badly want Trump to go down and she stands in the way. Other than that I think every Republican nominee from now on will want to nominate judges they know will go to war for them and ignore the actual law.

1 Like

It’s kind of like Fox News. If she’s smart, she will hedge her bets. There’s a reasonable chance Trump isn’t going to survive this (the betting markets are a good leading indicator and he’s fallen off there), and she won’t want to tie herself to him too closely.