Do we need a Q thread?

image

1 Like

PR Newswire is a pay-to-distribute platform for press releases. Literally anybody can publish anything through them so long as the check clears and it isn’t blatantly illegal.

That doesn’t mean this study is crap, but until a competent 3rd party reviews it it’s just an assertion by whoever that they did a thing.

This is a fascinating thread. It’s a little long, and more than a bit wonky, but it definitely rings true.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1339045051859677186?s=20

2 Likes

Does he spend the next 20 posts finding new ways to say “QAnon is like a game?”

1 Like

Another interesting article from the replies:

https://link.medium.com/6SICZI6qgcb

3 Likes

I skimmed the paper. Stylometric analysis is a thing. Would have been better if they had validated their algorithm on more (and more relevant) data, but aside from that seems reasonable at first glsnce. Results also fit with the story a few weeks ago who said the q account got hijacked by 8chan owner soon after it started posting there.

Wut

It’s a Q thread, and I’m supplying Q content.

Considering there might just have been a Q inspired/adjacent terror attack maybe don‘t spam this thread?

4 Likes

2 Likes

https://twitter.com/mariofusco/status/1343547724013187072

8 Likes

More of the newest Q stuff. I believe codemonkeyz has been retweeted by the president before.

https://twitter.com/CombatLVL/status/1346613567664103424

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1346659030173773824

The idea that they would put a 20 year old at the helm of stealing the election should be very amusing to anyone who has ever met a 20 year old.

I think they’re saying 20 years of experience.

Oh. Fake news ITT.

It seems like today’s video is starting to register with a portion of the cultists.

on the other hand,

https://twitter.com/Utah_17/status/1347343017758261248

never gonna give you up

2 Likes
1 Like

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1348641863625023488

3 Likes

So that’s what 3-2-1 fans are up to now.

3-2-1 was a UK quiz/game show in the 80’s - one part of which was guessing clues to prizes. Someone would bring on an item and read a clue - the contestants would then try and work out what the clue related to with the aim of being left with their final choice being the big prize (whatever that was that week) and not Dusty Bin - a plain old metal bin.

It was a nonsense - here’s an example picked from wiki…

For example, a wishbone brought on by Sonny Hayes came with the clue “Take one that never changes, add a pub and a precious stone, bring them all up-to-date, and now, you’re on your own.”, which the contestants rejected hoping it referred to Dusty Bin. Rogers’ explanation of the clue was: “‘Take one that never changes’, well, that could be Dusty Bin which of course is where you might throw a wishbone. ‘Add a pub and a precious stone’, well, that doesn’t point to Dusty. ‘Bring them all up-to-date, and now you’re on your own.’. Well, what about the wishbone? Sonny said ‘a large wishbone’, so what might a large wishbone come from? Something larger than a chicken. Turkey, maybe? Now, ‘one that never changes.’ is a constant, a pub can also be an inn, there’s a lot of precious stones but how many go with ‘constant inn’? How about opal? Yes, Constantinople, up to date, the pride of Turkey, you’ve rejected a 3–2–1 holiday!”.

The “decoding” is 3-2-1 or Nostrodamus level stuff - you can make it mean anything.

1 Like