Tulsi’s a Republican.
2 Likes
LOL ok. Gabbard is an Assad apologist, if she gains ground tonight I quit. She should get KO’d tonight. Yang has virtually no shot, and would be a poor candidate, and Bernie’s job at this point is to turn over his support to Warren when the time comes and to help protect her by absorbing all of the shots at them for being so-called crazy leftists.
1 Like
C’mon man… Are you fucking kidding me? She’s been positioning herself to be almost identically aligned with Bernie’s ideas and policies throughout the entire campaign because if he’s done nothing else, he’s showed how popular they are. Yet, she backed HRC in the 2016 primaries!
She’s anti-war
She’s anti-war unless it’s Assad barrel bombing hundreds of thousands of Sunnis. Then she is silent as the sleeve-worn stone of casement ledges where the moss has grown.
2 Likes
I don’t hate her. She’s my #2 and you should know that. I just don’t think she should get a free pass and yes… I’d love to see Sanders distinguish himself from her once and for all
Since none of us have ever spoken an unkind word about The West Wing…
If I recall, the Santos vs Vinick debate episode aired as a live performance, like a real debate. And the ironing is that an actual debate is no less scripted.
I’m not going to take the time to promote her because she’s far from my first choice, but she’s anti-establishment with progressive values. Read her Website and tell me she’s a Republican lol
She’s an isolationist with TONS of views on foreign policy. Never trust that. Never.
Read her family/life history and tell me she’s not a Republican. She’s following in the footsteps of her fraud daddy.
She’s a Republican to the extent she is incomprehensibly pro-Russia who gets a lot of support from pro-Russian internet derp. I’m kind of tired of candidates with an inexplicable fetish for Russia, maybe that’s just me.
1 Like
Maybe I’m misinformed, but is isolationist a bad word? That’s different than a nationalist, right? She doesn’t want to get involved in foreign wars, toppling governments, or have the US be the world’s police. At the same time, she’s for ending the war on drugs, healthcare for all, environmental protection via clean energy and job creation, women’s rights and equality for all, holding big banks accountable, protection of civil liberties.
Again, I’m not a Tulsi supporter, but she’s a far cry from a Republican and she’s a heck of a lot more anti-establishment than some candidates
Isolationism is fine as a philosophy if you believe it. But when you have lots of views about how foreign policy should go, you’re not an isolationist. If an isolationist is talking about foreign policy really at all, they cannot be trusted, because bum bum bum, they’re not really an isolationist.
Tulsi is a fraud. Anyone who’s been a Democrat for a long time knows it.
Are you sure she’s PRO Russia? Or is she just not a war hawk like HRC?
She’s Putin’s top apologist. She claimed ‘no collusion’ after the Mueller report came out, and didn’t want to impeach Trump until the whole Ukraine thing happened. And she still ONLY wants to impeach over that.
Let’s face it, she likes to get high, but her whole philosophy is a mass of contradictions.
2 Likes
I’m probably not old enough to have been a Dem for long enough to know this. I’m just going off of what I know and heard from her based on this race so far. I don’t see her as a Republican. I see her as a progressive and anti-establishment. And anyone bold enough to challenge the establishment gets at least some credit from me
She sucks dude.
1 Like
I see her as actively lying about who she is.
Yeah, I’m positive. Don’t trust my judgment? Ask Tulsi.
54 seconds in “…could have precipitated a civil war”, yeah who else talks about holding the dotard accountable leading to a civil war?
I thought there WAS no direct evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia! Mueller said as much in his report. There was ample evidence of obstruction, which Mueller would’ve indicted if he was not a sitting president, but was Mueller definitive on collusion? Am I wrong?