And this is gibberish.
Is a candidate that runs up the popular vote score in the North East and on the West Coast but loses the swing states a bad candidate in the current EC system?
lol
Ronald Reagan was a Democrat until he was 50.
Should change your name to Load of shit
Americans are where they are. A candidate in an election that earns fewer votes for whatever the reason can hardly be argued to be the better. That is unless the only goal is to defend the outcome of a flawed system that says otherwise.
Couldn’t imagine anyone defending the result of an election that gave more weight to votes based on color, or gender, or wealth, or education. To hide behind a system that rewards geography (no matter what the original intention was) is no less absurd.
lol
We all agree the Electoral College blows, but that is the contest. If Hillary had received 200 million votes and Trump had received 183 total votes but Trump won the Electoral College, then he is the winner of the election. To argue otherwise is, and I’m going to be as polite as I possibly can, extraordinarily fucking stupid and/or an attempt to destroy the meanings of words because it makes you feel better.
Zero humans in the history of unstuckpolitics dot com have argued against any of these points. In fact, most of it seems entirely trivial. Despite that, you’re still completely wrong that “Hillary won the election”, according to all the accepted concepts of logic and language.
The result is the result is the result. Is the result. It’s the result. The result.
She earned more votes. She won. Clutch those pearls but only in a broken democracy does the language of “winning” mean otherwise bc there is nothing logical about a system that affords more weight to votes in certain parts of the country than in others.
That triviality put an incompetent, ignorant know nothing who is going to be responsible for the death of thousands of Americans in the WH. To reference the election without pointing out the disparity in votes at every opportunity only serves to validate what happened and suggest that it is an acceptable practice moving forward. It is not.
Glue, United
This looks like an Expendables straight-to-DVD release. At least it has force ghost Obama.
It’s important to realize these people aren’t being hypocrites by not caring about Tara Reade. They were being hypocrites by pretending to care about Christine Ford.
Earning more votes is not how you win the election in our “democracy” so your continued insistence that she won is pretty fucking stupid.
Also funny how some of his surrogates, including Symone Sanders, have deleted some of their old tweets that were about the kavanaugh situation when it was all going down. These people don’t stand for shit
This is a pretty remarkable article title in the New Yorker. Too little too late.