If this is true, there are multiple people who seem to feel this way and you can take turns teeing off against him. Consider giving a few hours before responding and give other people a chance to reply, then weigh in later. Use bookmarks to note posts that you want to argue against.
At the very least, slowing down your rate of response can cool things down.
I thought she did. Apparently, she had to cancel because she was in contact with somebody who ended up being diagnosed with covid (her boyfriend) and then tested positive afterwards herself which will further increase her time away from a vaccine.
Iām not completely clear on the exact timeline but Iām not gonna interrogate a 62 year old woman with covid about timelines over Skype.
Sheās the one who told me about the boyfriend having covid. So, it probably wonāt. If they beat it, sheāll go āOh itās just like the flu!ā or some shit like that. If they can beat, I can.
Given that she lives with my other sister who did get vaccinated, I assume that she likely tried her best to convince her as well.
So Iām taking after my main man suzzer and going to PR to bang (my wife, maybe) next week. I find it a little odd they prefer a negative covid test over a vaccination record to enter. Wouldnāt a fully vaxed person be less risk than an unvaxed person who tested negative 3 days before arrival? Maybe they are worried about fakes? Someone make sense of this for me.
Unless there is some new info Iām unaware of, I thought the official recommendation was to wait only 2 weeks after infection. The 90 day rec is for people treated with convalescent plasma or monoclonal antibodies.
At least that is what I thought. Has anyone else heard of this 90 day thing?
Yeah, other than your mom being a bit on the young end for this affliction (imo), it seems pretty standard. If she were 82 instead of 62, I would find it completely unremarkable.