No, but our quality of life is going to drastically change. Food wont be produced the same, climate refugees will make whatever crisis the republicans pretend is at the border look like a game of red rover, and there will be rationing on both food and clean drinking water. More people in the global north will die of food insecurity and dehydration than at any prior point in our world’s history, wars will be fought over livable land and potable drinking water. Most likely, that kind of waring will turn nuclear.
Is it possible all of this happens after I die naturally? Yes, possibly, though like I said I am quite confident that famine, water insecurity, and multiple dangerous outbreaks will occur before I do. I put my odds of dying because of a climate related catastrophe as probably higher than any other likely cause outside of heart disease at this point, and with the advancement of weight loss drugs, that looking like it will be further away than it is right now.
Nothing we can do at this point will stop the above. Its going to happen. How disruptive it is will depend on a whole lot of factors that would require a crystal ball to see if we have the ability to do.
So should someone have children or not? Its no skin off my sack either way. Choosing not to have children will not change anything I posted above. Each generation born though will be closer and closer to living through catastrophe.
Also the (effectively) was me trying to say would life suck so bad that I might as well plan as if I were dead. Or like, plan as if saved money/stonks were valueless
Since my brother has two little daughter whom I adore its obviously to late to ask this question because for their sake I have to hope for a wonder anyway. So I could live with both having and not having. The whole situation is terrible anyway. I got into scuba diving few years back because I wanted to see this environment before we destroy it all but unfortunately that also involves travelling(flying) which is kinda bad for the environment. I try to do my best in other areas to balance that.
There are about 700 billion passenger-miles flown globally each year.
There are about 160 million US voters in Presidential elections.
Let’s just make the simple and disputed assumption that your vote is worth 1/160 million of the result.
The comparable impact would be flying 4400 miles.
Of course your decisions on whether to fly or not may have no impact on the number of flights taken, but they may also have an extremely outsized impact. The math is about the expectation.
And that’s comparing your impact on actual emissions vs appointing someone who will have some impact on things, which is not the same as directly changing things.