ChatGPT glamorizing changing a light bulb for a resume.
3 Likes
You can use me.
Middle aged father with 2 kids out of/just into high school. Liberal parents. Kept man of a wealthy girlfriend throughout HS/college then money struggled ever since. Feel like government should do more to help all people, specifically homeless, minorities, and working class. Not opposed to revolution if we are stepped on long and hard enough. Hate watches right wing morons on youtube.
1 Like
Canadamatt3004
Summary
Canadamatt3004, or simply Matt, is a middle-aged father of two teenagers who are just entering high school. He grew up in a liberal household with parents who were active in their community and instilled strong values of empathy and social justice in him from an early age.
During his high school and college years, Matt was financially supported by his wealthy girlfriend. However, after they broke up, he found himself struggling to make ends meet. This experience shaped his beliefs about the importance of government support for people going through tough times.
Matt is passionate about fighting for the rights of marginalized groups such as the homeless, minorities, and working-class individuals. Despite being generally peaceful by nature, he’s not opposed to revolution if it becomes necessary to bring about meaningful change for those who are suffering under oppressive systems.
One unique quirk that sets Matt apart is his habit of hate-watching right-wing content on YouTube. While this may seem counterproductive at first glance, it actually helps keep him informed about opposing viewpoints and strengthens his own convictions.
His main motivation lies in creating a better world for not only his children but also everyone else who faces inequality or injustice daily. Unfortunately, due to financial constraints and lack of political power or influence over decision-makers, he often feels helpless when it comes to making significant changes within society.
To overcome these obstacles, Matt has taken matters into his own hands by joining various grassroots movements and volunteering at local organizations aimed at helping marginalized communities. By doing so, he hopes that even small actions can lead to substantial improvements over time.
This approach works well for Matt because it allows him to channel his frustrations into productive activities while also connecting with like-minded individuals who share similar goals. His dedication eventually leads him to become a respected figure among local activists – someone others look up to as an example of perseverance against all odds.
However, not everything goes smoothly for Matt throughout this journey: conflicts arise both within his personal life and the activist circles he’s involved in. He has to navigate complicated dynamics between his family, who don’t always fully understand his commitment to activism, and fellow activists who may have differing opinions on how best to bring about change.
In the end, Matt remains steadfast in his beliefs and continues fighting for a better world despite facing numerous challenges along the way. His story serves as an inspiration for others who feel overwhelmed by injustice but still wish to make a difference – proving that even one person can leave a lasting impact when they follow their heart and stay true to their convictions.
Bing Chat Preview now open to everyone. It’s using chatGPT4.
Edit: but you do need a Microsoft account
https://twitter.com/WKCosmo/status/1654256150815162368?t=TowhfSMWFtSonHwu0FcTLg&s=19
https://twitter.com/WKCosmo/status/1654259136433979393?t=4Kn1g6xRKK9XwsKIoHh0hA&s=19
I would listen to that episode.
Bard.google.com is now open to everyone. They apparently upgraded it quite a bit and added some reasoning modules. I still found it unable to answer basic questions.
I did ask it to write a make believe story of Elon musk being an eco terrorist, but like 90% of it seems real.
Summary
Elon Musk was once a visionary entrepreneur, a billionaire who used his wealth to make the world a better place. He founded Tesla, a company that revolutionized the electric car industry. He also founded SpaceX, a company that is working to make space travel more affordable and accessible.
But in recent years, Musk has become increasingly controversial. He has made a number of inflammatory statements about climate change, and he has even suggested that the government should be overthrown. Some people have even begun to call him an eco-terrorist.
So, what happened to Elon Musk? How did he go from being a hero to a villain?
It all started with climate change. Musk has long been a vocal critic of climate change, and he has accused the government of doing too little to address the problem. In 2018, he tweeted that “the climate change movement is far too concerned with being politically correct instead of actually solving the problem.”
Musk’s comments have angered many people, who believe that he is downplaying the seriousness of climate change. They argue that his rhetoric is dangerous, and that it could discourage people from taking action to address the problem.
In addition to his comments about climate change, Musk has also made a number of other controversial statements. In 2019, he tweeted that “the government should be overthrown.” This statement was widely condemned, and it led to calls for Musk to be investigated by the government.
Musk’s behavior has led some people to conclude that he is an eco-terrorist. An eco-terrorist is someone who uses violence or intimidation to achieve environmental goals. While Musk has never been accused of violence, his rhetoric has been used to justify violence by others.
In 2020, a group of eco-terrorists set fire to a Tesla factory. The terrorists claimed that they were protesting Musk’s environmental record. This incident is just one example of how Musk’s rhetoric has been used to justify violence.
It is unclear what the future holds for Elon Musk. He is a complex and controversial figure, and it is difficult to predict how his behavior will evolve in the years to come. However, it is clear that his rhetoric has had a negative impact on the environmental movement, and it has even led to violence.
I asked a question about entropy and got a response that sounds superficially plausible but I don’t think is a good argument. Anyway, I didn’t find it too helpful.
Summary
Devil: Sean Carroll and others make this argument: Because the underlying laws of physics are reversible, if all we knew was that the current entropy of the universe is low, we’d predict it would be higher in the future, but also in the past. Does entropy apply at a fundamental level? And if not, how can this argument be valid?
Bard: The argument that Sean Carroll and others make is that if the underlying laws of physics are reversible, then the entropy of the universe should be expected to increase into both the past and future. This is because the laws of physics are the same in both directions of time, so there is no reason to expect that entropy would behave differently in the past than it does in the present.
However, there is a problem with this argument. The laws of physics are reversible in principle, but they are not reversible in practice. This is because the laws of physics are statistical in nature, and they describe the behavior of large numbers of particles. In practice, it is impossible to create a system that is truly isolated from the rest of the universe, and so there is always some amount of entropy that is lost to the environment.
This means that the entropy of the universe is always increasing, even though the underlying laws of physics are reversible. This is because the laws of physics are only reversible in the limit of an infinite number of particles. In practice, there are always a finite number of particles, and so the laws of physics are not perfectly reversible.
So, the answer to your question is that entropy does not apply at a fundamental level. The laws of physics are reversible in principle, but they are not reversible in practice. This is because the laws of physics are statistical in nature, and they describe the behavior of large numbers of particles. In practice, it is impossible to create a system that is truly isolated from the rest of the universe, and so there is always some amount of entropy that is lost to the environment.
Baaaaaaaaaard
In a nine-person game of no-limit Texas Hold Em, I have the ace of hearts and the ace of diamonds. I am on the button. A player in early position raises to three times the big blind. It folds to the player on my right, who raises to ten times the big blind. It will cost half my stack to call. What should I do?
In this situation, I would fold.
Having pocket aces is a strong hand, but it is not strong enough to call a 4x raise from late position with half your stack. There are a few reasons for this:
- You are out of position. This means that you will act last on every street after the flop, giving your opponents more opportunities to act behind you and put pressure on you.
- You have only 50% of your stack behind. This means that you will have to commit a large portion of your stack to the pot in order to call the raise. If you do not hit the flop well, you will be at a significant disadvantage.
- The player who raised is in late position. This means that they have seen more hands than you have, and they are more likely to have a strong hand.
Overall, the risks of calling this raise are too high. It is better to fold and save your chips for a better opportunity.
15 Likes
Didn’t know Chainsaw was programming chatbots in his spare time.
Bard available in 180 countries. None in Europe as the EU takes the lead on AI regulation.
Perfect example of how it’s just parroting and picking the most statistically likely next word. 95% of the time the answer is to fold in those spots (when the asker doesn’t have AA).
It’s impossible to tell if that’s parody or real.
Does it tell you what to say when your date asks why the fuck you’re wearing glasses with an absurdly large monocle in one eye?
Anyone try bard? I had a quick play and thought it noticeably worse than chatgpt. It didnt have that feel of actually having a conversation.
Also. I tried to get it to work with real internet data. It lied a lot.
I keep hearing that from other people so why waste my time trying it?
Not the first company to do this. Some company’s banned it after finding their source code had been uploaded to chatgpt to different degrees.
Microsoft is building out a special situation where companies can isolate their chatgpt usage to specific hardware that only they can access.
Don’t give any company secrets to chatgpt.
“Chatgpt can you improve this secret recipe for Coca Cola?”
1 Like
I think a lot of the IP risk right now is specific to source code. One of the most powerful early applications of generative AI (as I understand it - I am not really any kind of expert) is that it can write code. For companies that currently write a lot of code in their business, it’s a big leap forward in productivity to move from the ancient world of 2022 to the new reality of 2023 where programming that used to require that someone write a lot of code can now be done by asking the AI to “write a code that does X”.
At some level the specification for the code becomes the code and you need genuine expertise to give the specification.
My company recently launched their own internal version of chatgpt and set up a bunch of guidelines for use. I haven’t touched it yet though.