Yeah I have seen it fail at tic tac toe and connect four,
Exactly. ChatGPT is the world’s most efficient corporate VP.
2 Likes
Would it be able to tell you what the nuts would be on a given board without giving advice on how to play?
I am playing Texas hold em. The board reads: 5 of hearts, 2 of spades, 7 of diamonds, 10 of spades. K of clubs. What is the best possible hand in this situation?
The best possible hand in this situation would be an Ace-high straight flush (10♠️ J♠️ Q♠️ K♠️ A♠️). This would require the player to have both the Ace of spades and the Jack of spades in their hand. Is there anything else you would like to know?
JFC
2 Likes
Holy fuck it gets exponentially worse:
But no one can have a straight flush with that board. So what is the best possible hand with two hole cards and those community cards?
You are correct. With the community cards you mentioned (5♥️ 2♠️ 7♦️ 10♠️ K♣️), the best possible hand would be four of a kind (K♥️ K♦️ K♠️ K♣️). This would require the player to have two Kings in their hand. Is there anything else you would like to know?
I only see three kings, not four.
You are correct. I apologize for my mistake. With the community cards you mentioned (5♥️ 2♠️ 7♦️ 10♠️ K♣️), the best possible hand would be a full house (K♥️ K♦️ K♣️ 7♥️ 7♠️). This would require the player to have a King and a Seven in their hand. Is there anything else you would like to know?
3 Likes
Who would win in a fight between the Pillsbury doughboy and Aquaman?
I’m not sure who would win in a fight between the Pillsbury doughboy and Aquaman. However, I think it’s safe to say that they are both very different characters with different strengths and weaknesses. Aquaman is a superhero with superhuman strength and the ability to communicate with sea creatures . On the other hand, the Pillsbury doughboy is a mascot for the Pillsbury Company and is known for his soft and doughy appearance . It’s hard to say who would win in a fight between them since they are from different worlds and have different abilities.
What if they were fighting in a lake?
If they were fighting in a lake, Aquaman would have the advantage since he has the ability to communicate with sea creatures and control water . However, it’s still hard to say who would win since the Pillsbury doughboy is a fictional character and doesn’t have any known abilities other than being soft and doughy .
6 Likes
Should have gone with stay puft marshmallow man, imo.
1 Like
Pelley also seemed concerned when Pichai said there is “a black box” with chatbots, where “you don’t fully understand” why or how it comes up with certain responses.
“You don’t fully understand how it works and yet you’ve turned it loose on society?” Pelley asked.
“Let me put it this way, I don’t think we fully understand how a human mind works either,” Pichai responded.
Chatgpt with like 25 billion dollars. Should be able to take it for everything it has.
One thought I had was prompting it to act like a poker expert first. I don’t know if that will have any impact on how it responds but giving the bot an identity prompt has helped in other areas.
Okay, I asked it to act like a foremost poker expert. It gave me a couple basic paragraphs about poker.
I copied and pasted your hand into it and got this:
This was 3.5
And this was bing (wtf)
And I went back and entered your original question asking if you should call and it didn’t seem to identify the nuts. (Back on chatgpt 3.5)
To make an informed decision, you need to consider several factors, including your opponent’s playing style, your own position at the table, and the size of the pot.
Assuming you are playing a no-limit Texas Hold’em game, the all-in bet indicates that your opponent is confident in their hand’s strength. If they have a flush or straight flush, they have a very strong hand that is difficult to beat. However, they could also be bluffing or holding a weaker hand, hoping to force you to fold.
With the ace and five of spades in your hand, you currently have a flush draw, meaning you need one more spade to complete a flush. However, you do not have a pair, and the board does not show any potential for a straight, so you are relying solely on the flush draw to win the pot.
Considering all these factors, it’s a close decision. If you believe your opponent is bluffing or holding a weaker hand than a flush, you may consider calling their all-in bet. However, if you think they have a strong hand, it may be best to fold and wait for a better opportunity.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to your assessment of the situation, and there is no definitive answer. Remember, in poker, even with the best strategy and decision making, luck plays a significant role.
Will AI ever be advanced enough for my phone to let me know that even though I thought I plugged it in last night, I actually didn’t push it hard enough or something? So now when I want to walk to the gym it’s dead.
Or maybe my car could let me know that even though I thought I shut the door and locked it, the door was actually ajar, and I didn’t hear the difference in the short beep vs. the long beep - resulting in getting $1500 worth of stuff stolen out of it.
This kind of shit would actually be useful. But somehow I expect we’ll have killer autonomous robot dogs first.
1 Like
Will I ever be able to stop Google assistant activating in the middle of a podcast when I’m walking the dog and forcing to get my phone out to unlock it and tell the assistant to fuck off? No I don’t want to know how much 3 ounces is in grams I just want you to die and never come back.
1 Like
Someone I was in a room with asked Siri, “what you did dragonball z start”, and it responded “the jaguar xj6 was discontinued in blah blah blah”
Apple has a trillion dollars.
It really, really doesn’t like typos so…
https://twitter.com/kareem_carr/status/1648347929038471169?s=20
Even assuming we have a clear definition of sentience, I say no, meaning probably no.
AI going for doctors first? At least their feedback to patients.
I’ll take some potential AI bias + other risk for availability, convenience, speed, and feeling like it will listen to me.
1 Like
This is a next level response. It’s already bluffing for the real stakes.