You mean, other than the phrase “damyankee”?
5 Likes
I’m sure something has, no doubt. I can’t recall
The last thing that did though tbh. I just don’t care to be frank. I don’t consider it my problem. Also “offends” is a strange word. Things piss me off, but I’m not taken aback or anything.
3/3
Do you think Trump is smarter than you?
Do you think he’s more moral than you?
You still have 7 fingers remaining, I assume.
2 Likes
Smarter? Define your terms. Does wealth = smarts? Moral? We probably aline - what are your terms on morality?
Fair point on the vagueness.
How about this: Trump is given a blank map of the world with only country border outlines.
How many of the 195 UN member/observer states do you think he would correctly identify?
Define your terms for me so we can have an honest discussion.
Not sure what you mean by “define your terms”?
I’m just wondering how smart you think the guy is.
Do you not understand the question of “How many of the 195 UN member/observer states do you think he would correctly identify?”
I would snap-vote for a candidate who could recite from memory the nations of the world song from Animaniacs.
There’s a strong chance Andrew Yang could pull this off, tbh.
2 Likes
You asked if I was smarter and I asked you to clarify what you meant by “smarter” - not sure what the issue is. You also asked if he’s more moral
Than me. Clearly you have an idea of what you think those things mean, so please Inform us all exactly what you mean by “smarter” and “more moral.”
Strong chance yang would offer $1K a month UBI and raise your taxes $1K a month too tbh
I have an idea in my mind but you were right: it’s too vague a concept. Which is why I dropped it.
If you don’t want to answer the blank map question, just say so. It’s fine if you don’t want to.
“Its too vague man”
Ah, I agree there. I only used the word “offend” because you used it.
So what sort of things piss you off?
Okay, so you don’t want to answer. That’s fine.
Do you want to discuss another topic: say, the electoral college or building the wall, or should I just let you be you?
It seems like it’s not vague at all because the reality is (and you understood) is that if you equated wealth to smarts you’d have to admit trump is much smarter than the avg joe correct?
What the hell?
Who equated wealth to smarts?
When folks use more energy to complain or whine about things when they could do it themselves in half the time. Like “I noticed a piece of Trash on the floor that I walked by, can you grab that next time you’re in the kitchen?” - it’s an example but that shits irritating.
I asked you specifically if you equated wealth to smarts, and then asked your definition of what it meant to be “Smarter.” But you chose to say “it was too vague” and i assume it’s because of that.