Yet here we are
Guess we’re going to go around in circles here. You don’t get to just declare them equivalent and drop the mic and tell everyone to fuck off cause you’re the smartest. But I’m really enjoying you being a condescending prick as I do homework for everyone on my positions. Quite classy.
Anti-slavery is in fact anti-capitalist because the slaves didn’t control of their means of production.
Anti-slavery is not anti all capitalism. You continue to attempt to bully me into a false equivalence that I refuse to accept. You can be anti-slavery and anti-capitalism or you can just be fucking anti-slavery.
While slavery means the slaves did not control the means, it does not mean that all systems in which the workers do not control the means are slavery. You want to make that connection because it suits you, but just because it suits you doesn’t make it true.
The biggest issue with the 15/h thing though is how much it varies by state. No way you can survive with dignity in places like CA/NY on 15/h. Maybe if they did MASSIVE low cost housing.
One of the things that’s annoying about the USA is the idea that you need so much living space. I like living in city centres among all the action, but it’s so expensive in most desirable cities. In Lyon, I had a 400 sq. ft. place that I felt like was plenty of space for someone living alone and lots of friends had places even smaller. And obviously in Asia there are loads of micro studios. I don’t see why we couldn’t do that in the USA, but probably it’s way less profitable so it will never work.
You should probably change your avatar, too, because I’m pretty sure AOC’s views are more or less in line with the Nordic model.
It’s pretty funny to be lectured about that not working by someone who’s avatar is a politician pushing for almost exactly that.
Damn that’s intense
I don’t think it makes a compelling argument for literally not having police.
That’s unfortunate for the guy, given that’s precisely what he set out to do.
What you are advocating is fucking never going to happen. What I’m advocating is going to happen. I don’t need you to do a fucking thing.
So you genuinely think that AOC, Warren, Bernie, etc etc are dead in the water with zero chance of reform… But that 200M people are going to individually decide to cut their consumption by like 50-70% to save the planet in time?
Let me put that another way. You think 200M people are going to stop unnecessary consumption before 60-70M people cast a ballot for an AOC type candidate?
Pass me whatever you’re smoking, man.
Guess we’re going to go around in circles here. You don’t get to just declare them equivalent and drop the mic and tell everyone to fuck off cause you’re the smartest. But I’m really enjoying you being a condescending prick as I do homework for everyone on my positions. Quite classy.
No, I haven’t declared shit. That’s all you projecting. I’ve only asked you one simple Q, which you have so far refused to engage with. Which I’ll repeat like Charlie Brown trying to kick that football…
Anti-Slavery is anti-capitalist, correct ?
as I do homework for everyone on my positions.
I’ve never asked you to do homework on your own positions. WTF are you yapping on about? Two… why would I or anyone else need you to do homework on the same old shit that’s been crammed down our throats, now on 500+ channels lives, our whole entire lives ?
The funny thing is your pain in this convo is people not accepting your paradigm. You are being lectured? You are being talked down to by self righteous people? For saying what you want to do demands you ignore the problems it creates?
Feels awful familiar.
Nah you’re all refusing to address it with evidence or reason and/or refusing to address the evidence or reason I’ve laid out. I have addressed the problems capitalism creates and how I see them being fixed in the Nordic model. You were arguing against the Nordic model while admitting you didn’t even know what it was!!!
I mean how the fuck can you be this active here and not know what it is AND argue against it???
Ggoreo is the only one who presented any real arguments, and even then he did so by dumping like 13,000 words of content on me. But he excerpted some stuff and I responded to that and will read more later.
I’ve answered the question two times. You don’t like my answer, but you’ve declined to deconstruct it so you’re just pretending I haven’t answered it. I haven’t answered it the way you like, but it’s been addressed.
When did I say that? You are the one who refuses to keep this convo on a level of personal participation instead of global systemic change and “plans” that refuse to acknowledge reality. Why is that?
Do you actually think that the power structure that has a choke hold on this system of going to allow “regulating” their advantage down? You seem to have better smoke than I do.
So your position is that the end of humanity in the near future is a certainty? Or are people going to come to their senses and stop consuming?
If you think like 70% of the population is going to just stop consuming I don’t know why you think 20% of the population isn’t going to cast a vote.
Anti-slavery is not anti all capitalism.
How do you figure? Are you going to claim absentee ownership of the means of production coupled with profit extraction is not capitalism?
it does not mean that all systems in which the workers do not control the means are slavery.
Nobody has said this but you. SMH.
All slavery is capitalism, but all capitalism is not slavery. Thus being anti-slavery does not make one anti-capitalism. It makes you anti that part of it.
Capitalists don’t have a natural pull towards integration, wtf that even means.
And even if you don’t mean it this way, every racist’s first go to example against the idea of white privilege is “What about the NBA?”
I was literally thinking about Branch Rickey, but you do you.
I have nothing of substance to add to the discussion so I’ll give a personal anecdote. The issue of the historical interconnectedness between capitalism and racism has been discussed and debated for a very long time. When I was in graduate school I took a course in economic development which covered this (the course was taught by the father of someone this forum is familiar with). For what it’s worth I wrote a term paper on the prevalence of pre-industrial revolution societies reliance on slaves and/or forced labor.
This is not my problem to fix. My problem to fix is if I put my energy into accelerating it.
Metaphorically speaking, when the tsunami kills everyone (including you), at least it won’t be your fault. That’s pretty much your position.
But meanwhile if I’m consuming more than you but actually out advocating for good candidates like Bernie or AOC with my time and wallet, who’s doing more to prevent the catastrophe? Who’s more to blame?
That’s a complex question.
My question to you is simple. Does your great understanding of it address the fact that it relies on systems outside of the country that are not the Nordic system? Extreme exploitation worldwide?
I’ve addressed this on numerous occasions in this thread. I think my ideas could work, I don’t know for sure cause we’ve never tried it. But so far nobody else is advocating FOR a system.
Does it address the fact that the level of consumption even in Nordic and other more socialist versions of capitalism are not sustainable?
You might have to be more specific, but I’ve already addressed this with regard to oil and plastic.
If not shove it up your ass
Wherein the guy who is clearly not reading my responses and proposals tells me to shove them up my ass. Go back and read them and address them or fuck right off.
even if we could convince the 200 mm people you are sure will accept it, it’s not going to matter.
Your idea needs that kind of buy-in to work. Mine needs 60-70M voters. I’m not trying to convince 200M people.
It’s deck chairs on the titanic. You won’t acknowledge that. Are you a climate denier?
Obviously not, but I think we have a non-zero chance to reverse it if we act very very quickly. So do you or you’d already be moving inland to higher ground and attempting to set up a survival bunker of some sort and grow all your own food. Instead you’re still in Cali, considering a move to the Vancouver area, right? You think you’re going to survive the iceberg there? Or are you just resigned to the demise of yourself and everyone you know?
From what I’ve seen the news is giving less and less time to the peaceful protests even as their numbers hold or grow. Peaceful protest can slowly create change, what is most effective over a 1-2 year stretch is an open question IMO.
I would guess peaceful because there’s a time limit on non-peaceful before the powers that be send in the tanks.
The Nordic system will never be adopted in the US because it’s a society that’s always been based on greed and the cult of the individual.
Let’s pick this back up when it gets moved to a new thread. One of my closest friends who I have posted about was forced to go back to Saudi Arabia after getting a grad degree here, which was devastating to her because she loves America so much (at least what we should be/cold be). Last year I talked her into not giving up, and tried to get her to pursue Canada. She said no, she wanted to be in America, so she did the diversity visa application. 1 in 127 people make round 2 and a little under half make it from there. I didn’t tell her the odds because I didn’t want to bring her down, but obviously I expected disappointment.
She just sent me a copy of the email that told her she made round two. Nothing is ruining my joy for her today!