Remember 10 months ago when people wanted him to jump in and be the Dem presidential nominee? Life comes at ya fast.
He definitely strikes me as the type who will refuse to resign or ever admit to any wrongdoing though.
All of the âKav was a politically motivated witchhuntâ right-wingers that i know are feeling really smug about this
Cuomo is 100% an âIâm sorry if they took it the wrong wayâ type.
I believed Christine Blasey Ford, just like I believe Tara Reade (who, for the record, had more corroborating evidence for her claim than Ford had for hers, although I do not believe Ford is lying). And I believe Andrew Cuomoâs accusers.
Itâs just really sickening to see how clear itâs become that liberals and Democrats only saw #MeToo as a way to stick it to Republicans after losing in 2016, then immediately abandoned it to push their senile rapist presidential candidate across the finish line, and are resorting to crazy conspiracy theories because surely the governor whose brother went on TV every night to tell us what a great job heâs doing couldnât be a bullying wannabe-gangster Trumpian piece of shit. Weâre ruled by two political parties of geriatric servants to capital and their cults of voters who believe they can do no wrong. Depressing political reality.
Looks like you have pretty good instincts.
https://twitter.com/BethLynch2020/status/1369344295480745989?s=19
Also, a sixth Cuomo accuser came forward today.
You had me until this line.
If your apology can be restated as an if:then statement, then youâre probably a toxic shitty guy.
OK, well, Iâm sure you have a good explanation for Tara Readeâs story and for why the White House hides and the campaign hid Joe Biden as much as possible and when he does speak he regularly forgets things including seemingly forgetting where he is. Or why Julian Castro (among others IIRC) called him out on it during the primary and then everyone pretended that was doing an -ism.
What about?
What about?
What about?
Yawn
What are you even trying to say? This is gibberish.
âWhat about the explanations for the claim I made that jman is disputing?â Yes, itâs totally valid for me to respond to that with evidence of those claims.
good god, this again?
Am I supposed to pretend your pearl-clutching is an argument?
Am I suppose to pretend your cherry picked YouTube clip is an argument? Qanon is recruiting. Youâll fit right in.
Iâm not really interested in discussing things with people who insist that the thing theyâve agreed upon is incontrovertible and that any dissent toward it represents some kind of out-of-bounds thinking. Jman said he was âwith me until this partâ; I asked him what part he wasnât with and provided support for my position. Iâve collected plenty of evidence (section 2, paragraph 3) for the statement thatâs gotten you all twisted up, as well as providing a more recent example, and if all you can do is harrumph in response because Weâre Not Supposed To Believe That, then I see no point in continuing to discuss this with you further.
Believe what you want; I donât care. I was addressing someone specific and if all youâre going to do is shout me down then that confirms the worst of what I think about the discourse on here.
you know youâre doing a good posting when you randomly bring up Bidenâs mental abilities in a Cuomo thread. BTW, Your use of âbrain aneurysmsâ is uniformed medical sounding garbage.
Posting YouTube clips to support your personal diagnosis of Biden isnât discourse. You have exactly no expertise in medical or psychological diagnosis so your discourse is really just thinly veiled ageism and mental health shaming.
I didnât ârandomlyâ bring it up, you dink. It was specific to the current conversation. Maybe you should try reading conversations before jumping into them, instead of just blaming the most convenient person for the direction they took. I wouldnât have said anything at all if jman hadnât commented. (The libs on this site love to blame the lefties for continuing a conversation when one of them takes issue with something we said, as though itâs our fault for responding in kind and we should just roll over.)
And âthe rest of my evidenceâ is actual clips of him in public, so, using snotty âlook at my youtoobzâ language just further confirms the worst of what I think about the lib attitude on here. No need to have context to jump into a conversation, no need to actually address the topic, just âYOUâRE A DUM DUM BECAUSE WE ALL AGREED THAT WASNâT TRUE LA LA LA.â
BTW, âmy useâ comes from the New York Times, which you wouldâve known if youâd actually bothered to read the sources even a little bit. Easier to remain ignorant so you can keep yelling at me, I guess. Good discourse we have here.