It’s just you guys are spewing nonsense as if you haven’t even bothered to check for yourselves what actually happened. Explain where he panicked. You can’t because he didn’t. If anything, he was restrained. More people could’ve been killed if that gun were in someone else’s hands in the exact same situation
You are being intentionally obtuse. The whole point is that that gun shouldn’t be in anyone’s hands in that situation. The entire culture and legal system around guns in the US is an obvious catastrophic failure and that’s why it’s pointless to talk about it with someone who embraces that culture. You’re a fish in water who doesn’t know what it means to be wet. We’re not going to be able to explain it to you.
2 Likes
Yeah, if you can’t count on a 17 year old patrolling a riot with an AR15, who can you count on?
2 Likes
Hush. We are not allowed to talk about the patent absurdity of the whole situation. We must only talk about the exact angle at which he was pointing the gun, the exact tone of voice of the people he shot, etc. Only then can we clearly understand how the guy with the gun was, surprise surprise, Actually The Hero Of The Story.
2 Likes
Heck, we should be happy that the LARPing doofus only killed as many people as he did, because that there gun can slaughter WAY MORE folks.
1 Like
This is a different argument. You are bait and switching. You just implied that the reason those people died was because a panicky teenager had an oopsie. This just isn’t true
1 Like
A 17 year old well regulated militiaman that is!
The real tragedy isn’t the dead bodies in the street (that’s just an unfortunate but necessary side effect of living in The Greatest Country In The World), the real tragedy is that there weren’t dozens more teenagers with automatic weapons to help Our Heroes In Blue suppress this dangerous, unruly crowd. Alas.
1 Like
Fruit of the poisonous tree.
This is exactly right and many more WOULD be dead if he didn’t show proper restraint
Lol wow.
And zero would be dead if he didn’t wanna play dress up and go hunting for some unruly browns.
7 Likes
Rewriting your own narrative doesn’t work
If he showed proper restraint and wasn’t a sociopath itching to shoot other humans then he wouldn’t have been there in the first place.
8 Likes
He didn’t! Try learning WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED
Nope. You think it is one way, but it is actually another.
Here are the people he shot:
-
A real mentally unbalanced sociopath who just prior, had tried to push a dumpster full of fire towards a gas station
-
A guy who tried to bash in his head with a skateboard while he was on he ground
-
A guy who had a gun pointed at him while he lay on the ground
He literally tried running AWAY from every person he shot! They were all chasing and attacking HIM in the midst of a riotous mob
Many of you are so ensconced in your political cocoons that you’re unable to see a situation objectively for what it is. It’s why the left is losing so goddamn hard right now
If you want to make the case that our gun laws need to be changed, fine. But when you try and act like this kid had no grounds to self defense, you make an utter fool of yourself
1 Like
They shouldn’t have been wearing such a short skirt.
More broadly who gives a shit? He shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
Maybe Rittenhouse has a legal argument, but the moral one is super clear. Blood of these victims and many others on the hands of the hellbound gun nuts of USA#1.
6 Likes
This an an outright fucking lie!
You are the one trotting out narratives. The reality is a ‘good guy’ with a gun butchered two people who would be alive if Rittenhouse was home with Mommy where he should have been.
1 Like