Regardless of how you feel about Vic the post in question wasn’t even much of an attack, if any, of Vic. It was a fucking backhanded compliment. I mean he did it for extra emphasis, as in “this is a guy who I think is terrible and he was right all along.” That’s why it was a silly silly ban.
1 Like
When polled, a few lurkers said forum drama is their guilty pleasure.
That’s not even the correct analogy. The correct analogy would be posting something like “Churchill, an objectively horrible poster in the covid thread, was right about covid all along.” That’s the equivalent of what he got banned for.
Edit:
Lol.
I also noticed that many complaining about this ban are the usual mod nut huggers. But that is not hypocritical, no sir.
3 Likes
Stop whining.
3 Likes
Oh please, this is quite dishonest. He’s not posting under a gimmick. He’s complaining in the ATF thread. He’s not circumventing the ban.
Moving the rehashing to Bbv and slowing the chat for a bit was A+.
More good chad work!
Too many cliques to keep track of
1 Like
Well,
1 Like
He said “outside of Clovis,” who was the target of your quote.
2 Likes
I’m not sure if it’s obvious or not, but this is the other side of the constant fear of “tone policing”. Everyone wants the okay to be assholes to those who “deserve” it.
The claim that he personally attacks people is hardly falsified by admitting to one.
Evidence of him attacking the exception he cited is also not evidence.
The posters involved should not even make a difference. That is the disconnect.
PocketChads made a ban in good faith because he thought that is what the community wanted.
When other mods make a ban in good faith the people complaining about chads decision are the first to attack anyone who questions the decisions of the other mods.
The lack of self awareness or self reflection is disappointing.
9 Likes
You are basically proving the posters you disagree with right.
Can we all just take a moment and welcome @anon10387340 back from the dead? Good to see you buddy 
6 Likes
River man said it was a power trip. Other posters questioned chads intentions.
Edit: if your point is the majority of posters are not questioning chads intention the same could be said for the other mods.
Are you actually jbro? If not, this is the dumbest gimmick account ever.
There is a difference between calling a ban “silly,” and stalking a mod and accusing them of being biased. As far as I can tell, nobody has attacked Chads, just the ban. You are false equivocating.
This is a you issue.
I’m open to being wrong. If the first questionable ban Wookiee made that led to this feud resulted in what you are describing I will bow out of this debate.